text
stringlengths 0
44.4k
|
---|
Institut f¨ ur Theoretische Physik, Universit¨ at Heidelbe rg, Philosophenweg 16-19, D-69120
|
Heidelberg, Germany
|
Email:s.koers atthphys.uni-heidelberg.de
|
Abstract: We construct new families of non-supersymmetric sourceles s type IIA AdS 4
|
vacua on those coset manifolds that also admit supersymmetr ic solutions. We investigate
|
the spectrum of left-invariant modes and find that most, but n ot all, of the vacua are stable
|
under these fluctuations. Generically, there are also no mas sless moduli.
|
∗Postdoctoral Fellow FWO – Vlaanderen.Contents
|
1. Introduction 1
|
2. Ansatz 3
|
3. Solutions 6
|
4. Stability analysis 11
|
5. Conclusions 15
|
A. SU(3)-structure 15
|
B. Type II supergravity 16
|
1. Introduction
|
The reasons for studying AdS 4vacua of type IIA supergravity are twofold: first they are
|
examples of flux compactifications away from the Calabi-Yau r egime, where all the moduli
|
can be stabilized at the classical level. Secondly, they can serve as a gravity dual in the
|
AdS4/CFT3-correspondence, which became the focus of attention due to recent progress
|
in the understanding of the CFT-side as a Chern-Simons-matt er theory describing the
|
world-volume of coinciding M2-branes [1].
|
Itismucheasiertofindsupersymmetricsolutionsofsupergr avityasthesupersymmetry
|
conditions are simpler than the full equations of motion, wh ile at the same time there
|
are general theorems stating that the former – supplemented with the Bianchi identities
|
of the form fields – imply the latter [2, 3, 4, 5]. Although spec ial type IIA solutions
|
that came from the reduction of supersymmetric M-theory vac ua were already known (see
|
e.g. [6, 7, 8]), it was only in [3] that the supersymmetry cond itions for type IIA vacua with
|
SU(3)-structure were first worked out in general. It was disc overed that there are natural
|
solutions to these equations on the four coset manifolds G/Hthat have a nearly-K¨ ahler
|
limit [9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14] (solutions on other manifolds ca n be found in e.g. [3, 15, 16]).1
|
To be precise these are the manifolds SU(2) ×SU(2),G2
|
SU(3),Sp(2)
|
S(U(2)×U(1))andSU(3)
|
U(1)×U(1).2
|
These solutions are particularly simple in the sense that bo th the SU(3)-structure, which
|
determines the metric, as well as all the form fluxes can be exp anded in terms of forms
|
which are left-invariant under the action of the group G. The supersymmetry equations
|
1For an early appearance of these coset manifolds in the strin g literature see e.g. [17].
|
2See [18] for a review and a proof that these are the only homoge neous manifolds admitting a nearly-
|
K¨ ahler geometry.
|
– 1 –of [3] then reduce to purely algebraic equations and can be ex plicitly solved. Nevertheless,
|
these solutions still have non-trivial geometric fluxes as o pposed to the Calabi-Yau or torus
|
orientifolds of [15, 16]. Similarly to those papers it is pos sible to classically stabilize all
|
left-invariant moduli [14]. Inspired by the AdS 4/CFT3correspondence more complicated
|
type IIA solutions have in the meantime been proposed. The so lutions have a more generic
|
form for the supersymmetry generators, called SU(3) ×SU(3)-structure [19], and are not
|
left-invariant anymore [20, 21, 22, 23] (see also [24]). Sup ersymmetric AdS 4vacua in type
|
IIB with SU(2)-structure have also been studied in [25, 26, 2 7, 28] and in particular it has
|
been shown in [28] that also in this setup classical moduli st abilization is possible.
|
At some point, however, supersymmetry has to be broken and we have to leave
|
the safe haven of the supersymmetry conditions. In this pape r we construct new non-
|
supersymmetric AdS 4vacua without source terms. This means that the more complic ated
|
equations of motion of supergravity should be tackled direc tly3. In order to simplify the
|
equations we use a specific ansatz: we start from a supersymme tric AdS 4solution and scan
|
for non-supersymmetric solutions with the samegeometry (and thus SU(3)-structure), but
|
withdifferent NSNS- and RR-fluxes. Moreover, we expand these form fields in t erms of the
|
SU(3)-structure and its torsion classes. This may seem rest rictive at first, but it works for
|
11D supergravity, where solutions like this have been found and are known as Englert-type
|
solutions [31, 32, 33] (see [34] for a review). To be specific, for each supersymmetric M-
|
theory solution of Freund-Rubin type (which means the M-the ory four-form flux has only
|
legs along the external AdS 4space, i.e.F4=fvol4wherefis called the Freund-Rubin
|
parameter) it is possible to construct a non-supersymmetri c solution with the same inter-
|
nal geometry but with a different four-form flux. The modified fo ur-form of the Englert
|
solution has then a non-zero internal part: ˆF4∝η†γm1m2m3m4ηdxm1m2m3m4, whereηis
|
the 7D supersymmetry generator, and a different Freund-Rubin parameterfE=−(2/3)f.
|
Also the Ricci scalar of the AdS 4space, and thus the effective 4D cosmological constant,
|
differs:R4D,E= (5/6)R4D. In type IIA with non-zero Romans mass (so that there is no lif t
|
to M-theory) non-supersymmetric solutions of this form hav e been found as well: for the
|
nearly-K¨ ahler geometry in [35, 29, 36] and for the K¨ ahler- Einstein geometry in [35, 20, 37].
|
In this paper we show that this type of solutions is not restri cted to these limits and sys-
|
tematically scan for them. Applying our ansatz to the coset m anifolds with nearly-K¨ ahler
|
limit, mentioned above, we find that the most interesting man ifolds areSp(2)
|
S(U(2)×U(1))and
|
SU(3)
|
U(1)×U(1), on which we find several families of non-supersymmetric AdS 4solutions. We
|
also find some non-supersymmetric solutions in regimes of th e geometry that do not allow
|
for a supersymmetric solution.
|
These non-supersymmetric solutions are not necessarily st able. For instance, it is
|
known that if there is more than one Killing spinor on the inte rnal manifold (which holds
|
in particular for S7, the M-theory lift of CP3=Sp(2)
|
S(U(2)×U(1))), the Englert-type solution is
|
unstable [38]. We investigate stability of our solutions ag ainst left-invariant fluctuations.
|
This means we calculate the spectrum of left-invariant mode s, and check for each mode
|
3Anotherroute would be tofindsome alternative first-ordereq uations, which extendthe supersymmetry
|
conditions in that they still automatically imply the full e quations of motion in certain non-supersymmetric
|
cases, see e.g. [29, 30].
|
– 2 –whether the mass-squared is above the Breitenlohner-Freed man bound [39, 40]. This is not
|
a complete stability analysis in that there could still be no n-left-invariant modes that are
|
unstable. We do believe it provides a good first indication. I n particular, we find for the
|
type IIA reduction of the Englert solution on S7that the unstable mode of [38] is among
|
our left-invariant fluctuations and we find the exact same mas s-squared.
|
These non-supersymmetric AdS 4vacua are interesting, because, provided they are
|
stable, they should have a CFT-dual. For instance in [20] the CFT-dual for a non-
|
supersymmetric K¨ ahler-Einstein solution on CP3was proposed. Furthermore, for phe-
|
nomenologically more realistic vacua, supersymmetry-bre aking is essential. Really, one
|
would like to construct classical solutions with a dS 4-factor, which are necessarily non-
|
supersymmetric. Because of a series of no-go theorems – from very general to more specific:
|
[41, 42, 43, 44, 45] – this is a very non-trivial task. For pape rs nevertheless addressing this
|
problemsee[46,47,45,48,49,28]. Inthiscontext thelands capeofthenon-supersymmetric
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.