prompt
stringlengths
9
123
chosen
stringlengths
2
717
rejected
stringlengths
15
732
reward_chosen
float64
0
1
reward_rejected
float64
0
1
This is an action Western.
The title of the film describes it--only I don't know how to call this movie "a western", much less a "western" story, or "action".<br /><br />A large, heavily armed mob marches through Central Park killing all but two tourists who are on their way out for the day. With only about three policemen left and one police dog in sight, they have no idea what happens next because that's also why we've been given little more than a glimpse into how these guys think.<br /><br />The main reason we watch is not even so much for entertainment as finding ourselves along with the gang (
A guy wants to run a mile and he does, so he decides that the other side will pay him money for it.<br /><br />He tells his friend about this, who's hired by the police chief (Cape Fear) because he can't arrest someone on evidence alone. So he takes two boys with $50 each from their home in Illinois into Virginia, where the father manages to shoot them. Now they must get there without anyone noticing them while driving through the country.<br /><br />'The Three Musketeers' kind of feels like one of John Wayne's early westerns except this time no big shot gets
0.001707
0.994532
This is the worst sequel
ever made with this actress. I'm guessing that her mother was a film producer and so, as such, there will be many more of these movies...<br /><br />The special effects are pretty good but not enough to really make you care about what happens in those scenes.<br /><br />(Note: The only reason people gave it 8 stars instead of something like average or better..is probably because they didn't see how poorly written most of them were) <br /><br />I have some respect for Jean Peters but she sure has lost all credibility during the 20+ years since the first movie (when
since Jumanji. The first was good but this one, well I mean it's bad and very predictable.<br /><br />The plot sucks! There are no surprises there (you would have guessed that by now). If you still want to see a funny cartoon - pick up The Naked Glaubers!!! <br /><br />I really liked the second and fourth films because they were different and had some humour to them as well. This film doesn't hold up with its awful script, bad acting and stupid jokes...<br /><br />If you've seen any of the previous movies then you already know that their character
0.000581
0.000488
Ah, Channel 5 of local
TV. Why we don't have a national service on their network was unknown to me... but that's about the only positive thing they do for people who still can get paid out in front of cameras.<br /><br />The title is really misleading here as the movie goes down rather abruptly when it should follow a couple scenes into its run time.<br /><br />I guess this one doesn't seem all that impressive at first because there isn't much visual appeal even if you know what's going on by now (not much). The music scene throughout the film didn't really hold my attention and I found the "funny bits"
TV.<br /><br />You'd never believe the horrible quality it was able to muster on a programme where someone named Joe Buck should be getting their teeth set out (on his own). He is obviously doing an impression as he's talking through two words - but I doubt the person recording this has seen anything remotely resembling the characters from The Wizard Of Oz in the past twenty years...<br /><br />Joe Buck being portrayed by Hugh Laurie does not help much. There aren't enough "real" voices left over for anyone in his category to do any justice at all; he sounds more like a bunch of cats having fun making up
0.000512
0.000491
Preposterous sequel stretches credibility to
the edge. This time around, James Woods and his bumbling butchering crew play the main characters in a spoof of old-timeer westerns.<br /><br />They pretend they are hired out by the government for one last run-of-the-mill law-enforcement assignment: get hold of some guns, put them together with some drugs to create "martyrdom", then shoot you when he finds your stash empty.<br /><br />Worth watching if only it weren't that lame. The script is crammed with overwrought stock characters (Pamela Franklin's hick ranchhand; Burt Reynolds'
the extreme and is just pure mindless action filled with clichés. Some would have it as a fun action adventure film but I found this movie to be an insult on acting skills, characters and overall quality of the production.<br /><br />The problem here isn't really the fact that there are more scenes in this one than the previous two films combined. The first 80% of the plot feels like it's getting shorter by the hour or so. This leads into some very long car chases where you can feel you're being pushed from side-to-side during quite a few seconds at time. There is no story progression until
0.000503
0.000484
Return to Cabin by the
Lake is an extraordinary film, unlike any other movie out there. I think this is one of those films that everyone should at least see once or twice.<br /><br />It's a sad movie as well but not just for its characters and story it tries so hard to follow (which was really amazing to me) but also as a metaphor of depression. In today's world where drugs seem like we can't help ourselves while we are young and do anything about anything (even if it does harm us), this will be more relevant than ever before because how often has your own mental illness caused you problems? Or even worse; do you
Lake is as enjoyable, if somewhat slow-moving (if that means you don't like watching dogs barking in an open field I guess), as it may sound. It's fun not because there's anything particularly exciting to see here but rather for the charming nature of being able to laugh at a story without actually having to worry too much about what will happen next...for example the two doggie friends who are getting into mischief while doing their own thing - quite obviously with some good humor thrown in there...<br /><br />But then again why would they even try? This movie was very entertaining and had plenty of things going on besides
0.998876
0.998921
This movie was made-for-TV, so
the script is pretty bad. The two people whose names I will not use are in this film - and they should have been! (They weren't all that smart.) Not only were we presented with a number of clichés at their expense: *A) They kept asking her for details about themselves until she finally gives them to him "for free" and then says no, because he's already given it away by the time that they're on screen together; B) She wants his money, but don't forget the deal with them being able to change their lives? Because if anyone really knew the exact circumstances surrounding this couple... *
its cast doesn't do much justice to the subject matter. The main character is played by a guy who acts like he's been sitting in his driveway for the past 3 months - and that seems like about how long the story takes.<br /><br />At least I got my $10.75 (after a free ticket) back because it seemed worth every penny. For some people this may be good. It has all of what makes me not really hate cable: variety of genres, different shows available from time-to-time, and cheap content as far as "big name stars" go. However, if you're just
0.000486
0.000504
IF you are planning to
book a tour of this beautiful area, I strongly advise that it is better not go. As you drive through and start seeing the amazing rock face and all its surroundings (which vary from one side to another), do look out for the signs "FLOODED" on top of your car as they appear every 20 minutes.<br /><br />As soon as you stop by the footpaths, some wild geese begin heading off and no matter how many times you try to catch their attention, there won't be any success in convincing them back at home in England. It's so close that if you don't watch carefully
watch this film you will be disappointed. Some actors and actresses (e.g. a good Jason Lewis as a father) try hard but it's not enough, or if they do at least there is no chemistry between them on screen.<br /><br />That can't mean that there isn't something good going behind the scenes.<br /><br />The music sounds pretty okay though so I'm sure some director has an idea of what he wants.<br /><br />And how funny for another American horror film where it comes out on TV! What was up with the other shows where Americans got into making scary movies? <br /><br
0.000516
0.000515
<br /><br />I saw this
movie yesterday in the theater.<br /><br />It was okay. I guess it is about a 20 year old girl who falls for her high school sweetheg (who also happens to be a college professor) and when she has sex with her teacher, he gets some trouble from his colleagues. It makes you wonder if these men are really into getting away with doing things they shouldn't do.<br /><br />But there were two reasons that made me laugh as I watched this. The first part of the film had another character talking behind him, and after seeing how stupid he sounds, your mind goes blank; the second
movie on HBO and I have to say its a great sleeper. The plot has more twists than you can shake an axe at, the acting is really good, especially Jennifer Tilly as one of the main characters.<br /><br />This movie doesn't get any marks for being overly heavy handed or getting caught up in itself but it does try too hard sometimes. All 3 leads act OK, Jennifer Tilly (who's also known for her sexy dancing) shines in her role as the main character who runs off with an unfaithful man. She plays her part brilliantly without having an Oscar win going nowhere so don't go expecting
0.002278
0.998899
I watched Cabin by the
Lake when it came out back in 1980. I remember thinking at once that it was great! Even now, having not read or seen a copy of this book on DVD (though hopefully soon will see one), and not even having written to my library, there is still something magic about this film.<br /><br />It all started with Edie Miller as Amanda Foster--a young woman who decides she's just plain tired. She goes up into the cabin where her parents were killed years ago because they don't have an escape route from their home--the last place they thought might be safe under those bad circumstances.
Lake as a child, and I can't believe that it's still not at least in my top 10 favorite movies. Even now, after all these years (and many "Holes" rehashes), I'm willing to admit this movie is truly one of those rare cinematic wonders that deserves to be considered classic status even if you've never seen any more Hitchcock pictures or Holes films.<br /><br />This first entry of an entire trilogy features two couples: Jake & Laura Carson; Jake's sister Mary-Ann, her husband Will and her twin daughters Julie and Emma, who have grown up together - but also
0.99828
0.998884
*Possible Spoiler*<br /><br />'Return to
Story' is a typical B movie where an old cop is given a chance (without much motivation and no script)to take the "job" back.<br /><br />This isn't your typical B-movie, so how do you get it off? The director tries all sorts of tricks: cutting from scenes one by one in order to give new angles or perspectives. He also uses the first person perspective every now and then just to throw some nice visual interest at the viewer.<br /><br />The story that is told here focuses on three people who are trying to put this job aside for what they feel may be their last day
Terror' is my worst nightmare from 1976. I rented it hoping for a fun horror film and found myself staring in an open air museum of gore festing, screaming corpses on the front lawn...and with only one other person watching.<br /><br />There's no sense whatsoever of continuity - there wasn't supposed be anything in between these scenes that had any connection? They were disjointed and disorientating like a game of 'Do you think she's awake or dead?' And even if they hadn't been separated so horribly this could have added some credibility...you'd think people might know who was good at murder
0.002624
0.000487
A decent sequel, but does
a better job of showing us the "sick" side to the character; which makes it easier for him to turn around and get better...<br /><br />There are many parts that make this film work - including Sam Rockwell's delivery and his own acting skills. However there can't be anything worse than how well Sam played himself in this sequel. Not one of those little flaws you could pick out in your typical movie.<br /><br />Even if they would've used some of Michael Nyqvist or Dakota Fanning (who should have been cast anyway because she plays such an annoying woman) instead we'd still
not stand up to the original. The story and dialogue are just as bad.<br /><br />The story is about a man who comes back from his job in Africa - he has an encounter with a monkey that gets infected by bacteria. He can't keep it down so the people of the village kill off all its villagers except for one child named Ollie (who dies).<br /><br />'Monkey's Paw' should have ended here instead of continuing on this path where it deviates into more slapstick silliness which you will never see again.<br /><br />(I am saying it isn't worth seeing if your
0.998892
0.000493
Return to Cabin by the
Lake is one of those films that are truly just wonderful. You get to see all kinds of great characters, and really do feel for them at some points...all in a way that's refreshing from today (the movies). This isn't going to shock or leave you cold when watching it; but if you've already seen this film then maybe you'll understand better why I find it so special.<br /><br />The story has two sides, and while we don't usually get into stories with two parts, let me make an exception here--Austen-like! The first part is told through Lydia Griswold's narration
Lake is a classic film from 1947, produced and directed with considerable skill and craft. In those days, such films would have been shown in motion pictures studios on Thursday nights at six or seven o'clock PM rather than Saturday Night Live or SNL.<br /><br />What makes this movie so good? Let me list them:<br /><br />An enchanting story that tells about two people who fall for each other only when they are stranded on a remote island inhabited entirely of cannibals (no weapons allowed) one being a former soldier turned lawman/road warrior, Mr Smith; and another woman named Laura
0.998937
0.998889
I thought Hedy Burress (who
I've always liked) was a perfect choice to play the lead in "Babel." Even though it is a comedy, she gives good acting. She seemed quite natural and natural as opposed to overacting and unnatural. As for Kurt Thomas....well, he's one of those actors you just can't help but see him again after watching his movie credits.<br /><br />As far as other comments about the acting go...hmmm......not too great -- even from my point-of-view. The story would have been much better if they had spent more time on character development, or at least avoided some characters' clichés. <
plays Lillian) was in this film at a time when she seemed to be making mostly supporting movies such as This Is Spinal Tap and My Beautiful Laundrette, except that here there is some funny stuff. I mean, "The Princess Bride" is no less hilarious than the movie itself! It's just not as good. That means we are getting the typical cast with decent writing: a 20-something woman who works for a big corporation on a huge yacht; an aspiring screenwriter; her fiancée (Hedy); their kids (aged nine-15) plus her housekeeper (with husband). The
0.998742
0.003065
Viewers gushing over everything including
the movie's title should have read something other than what went on in that tiny island. I saw this flick with my husband and he has watched it twice since and loves watching the kids from the beginning to the end because he wants his girls to see how hard they worked for their big moment, even though they were only little kids at that time.<br /><br />One thing is sure: if there was a "Disney" version of this flick (that I'm not aware of), it would be a far worse movie.<br /><br />This is one you can watch both young children as well as adults will enjoy--as long
this one will feel a tad uncomfortable and as the title would suggest are very unlikely to want to watch it. It is probably not really worth your time.<br /><br />If you're interested in knowing how good this film was, read these two reviews from other people at IMDb: <br /><br />1) The one by Brian: http://books.ebsbolt.com/275083.html?utm_source=hivemind&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=default&utm_content=brian%2F364&gclid=EEOBgHlOm9Zf-CCDQIBvXk
0.998662
0.001664
I saw this movie recently
and it has stayed on my DVR ever since (since I am a "RIP fans"). My friend and her friends all thought the film was great. They were talking about how terrible some of their older relatives are, but this is like 10 years later so that may be why they didn't notice! This isn't really bad in any way.<br /><br />The only thing i regret doing now would have been for him to shoot his arm. But yeah, if you're looking for good comedy these days don't miss seeing The Man from Snowy River because he's great too!!! <br /><br />Also just
at a theatre in the Philippines and I have to say that while it's certainly not my cup of tea, the film is surprisingly good for its genre. The acting doesn't disappoint as well though there is no singing but that alone is a plus considering we're talking about a Filipino drama.<br /><br />As far as plot goes, it is probably too simplistic (especially when compared with later Australian films), however that does not mean you shouldn't watch it; rather the fact that the story was simple allowed us see many of the characters' emotions unfiltered through their eyes which are pretty much the perfect fit here because both our protagonists,
0.998726
0.998915
Despite a decent first season
this show has been on the decline since it's inception. That is partially due to its poor production and plot devices as well. Its story line often falls through at times, and while they do some dramatic stuff here and there (as opposed to the usual predictable "shakes you awake in a dreamy state" sort of thing), their plot development doesn't always match up to what was supposed to be happening.<br /><br />If that didn't strike you as an insult upon seeing how little substance many seasons ago had to offer; then maybe you'd have enjoyed the show even more.<br /><br />Perhaps someone needs to
"Farscape" went on to star in just two more episodes and was quickly written out of the franchise's contract. While fans are grateful for these brief moments of continuity (most notably when John Turturro stars as Commodore Wickerman in what is arguably his most effective role), others seem uninterested.<br /><br />After some time alone with this film by itself - it took over an hour before I would get all the way through it once again, so consider yourself warned. When that came around at about 40 minutes into the movie there were still only four acting performances from William Shatner,
0.000499
0.001302
Anybody who has ever been
under the influence of the movie "Rocky" knows what I mean about this...I was really angry as a teenager when I watched this. At my age, I can still watch it whenever I want - but you have to think before watching!!!<br /><br />But let me explain that for now: It's another version of Joe Pilate fighting with boxing champ Apollo Creed in a boxing ring at 57 (the old Adrien Broncier is dead.) <br /><br />Pilates uses an advanced formula with super strength which prevents him from doing any real things - while he tries his best to win a
in a movie about men having sex and/or sexual intercourse knows that this is pretty much impossible because these guys are supposed to be emotionally stable, so why would they even agree? The answer may surprise you! Because when it comes to relationships with women, some of the men become emotionally unstable and very easy targets for what appears at first not be more than simple lust. Also many male characters have been shown as being extremely sexually interested/interested (although this could also mean: aroused) during their initial encounters - but then leave before enjoying them immensely.<br /><br />It's hard enough getting girls over by talking sweet, dancing cute or just
0.001563
0.00157
Okay first of all, I
a huge Fanboy/Thriller fan and this movie is one helluva Thriller that deserves to be the ultimate Classic in it's genre. This film was obviously made because The original "Crybaby"was no longer on tv.<br /><br />I think that there has always been an anti-theatre trend for some movies, or maybe my mind got jumpy while watching it but they are not what we call 'Phony' Movies....and then you have those that claim to be a masterpiece but actually only produce garbage! If you look back at it from 1986 when it came out it should
just have to tell you that this is a truly terrible movie. Not in any way related to the genre it falls into other than being completely dreadful.<br /><br />There were some decent aspects with the acting, except for one thing...when talking on your cell phone. It's awful how there are scenes where she has headphones (or earphones if her car can actually play music) and her voice isn't over 30/40 while driving or walking around by herself. The most annoying part was when she had trouble using the flash at night; whenever my mom would drive past us we could hear him whistling throughout
0.99809
0.000485
While it's early to say
if the series of seasons we have are complete, I've enjoyed every single one from start-to-finish. Now when they'll show the first season of New Avengers and a half dozen other original properties coming out next year, hopefully in some sort of chronological order so that everyone can watch them all properly.<br /><br />It does give me hope though - there IS STILL something worth watching after Disney cancels many Marvel shows! It's only an hour or so shorter than typical T.V., but hey - even with little extras added because of time restrictions sometimes you get more out of what your not seeing on TV! For instance, "
whether "Hustle and Flow" will be remembered as the most interesting movie of 2004, what is certain at this point are two things: There was no real script for its initial release, and there were not a lot of directorial honors on screen. Both James Lee Henson and Stephen Herek have been given their due credit in that regard; however, unlike the latter duo whose name comes through with aplomb when discussing his roles on both television shows - one being "Friends," the other the hit HBO program - here it seems like Theodor Geisel might actually come off like an honored contributor.<br /><
0.998739
0.995442
I'm not a huge Star
Wars fan, and I had been hoping to find something to enjoy on the DVD release. This was certainly nothing but garbage.<br /><br />The plot is very weak; people in uniform being executed by lightsabers with no apparent reason whatsoever (although clearly for some strange religious reasons). The ending is rather implausible as well - what's really surprising about this isn't how it actually ends; we know that all of *them* are killed at this point. There may be more than one way to kill off a lot of people, afterall! The movie's greatest fail-point seems to lie in how bad the CGI effects were
Trek fan, but the TNG episode "A Short Voyage" was well-acted and had some pretty intense dialog! I'd love to see this episode again. <br /><br />In another one of my favorite episodes, it also features a great sequence where several shuttle vehicles are trying to make a landing in an unknown planet when they are surrounded by massive hostile fireball-like creatures that look like giant rats with heads? They somehow miraculously manage to shoot out flaming spears at those monsters before all their ships explode into flame.<br /><br />The final scenes between DS9 captain Sarek's wife, Romana, and
0.000491
0.998831
The earlier part of the
film, showing the origins and development of the two principal characters are interesting. But there is nothing at all exciting about this third installment as well, though it does entertain for awhile if you want to do so. <br /><br />First of all, I had hoped that they would get along, but no such luck.<br /><br />This makes no sense whatsoever; why should a father take over a son's life while he remains ill? And, yes, what did happen in the movie itself just after his arrival?!<br /><br />I'm actually amused by how much attention has been paid to these issues; however:
movie is great, very funny and makes you laugh! After that sequence however i found myself wondering how exactly was this story connected to all these other things. And now it's about to get worse: The whole thing starts with the 'giving away' of something, later on in another scene... But not just enough.<br /><br />Why is there such a connection?<br /><br />I don't know : we'll never find out!! As far as I can see, no one will figure this stuff out anyway (not even John Cusack).<br /><br />If they are trying to make money for those
0.000486
0.000507
a movie that attempts to
make a deep point about life, family and friendship. the ending makes no sense at all! <br /><br />its great to see many teenagers in this country living their dreams. but most parents have never experienced anything like it before or even close<br /><br />'it was not always easy for me to understand this film, I suppose as my son is so old I couldn't comprehend what he was feeling.<br /><br />( i thought his teacher had hit him over the head with the tennis rackets?)<br /><br />so much has changed since 1968!<br /><br />the last time saw
do a lot of good things and fails miserably. what is it? two sisters growing up at the end of world war one are forced apart by death, or so they think but then there's something more. you may want your eyes on them both in order to know where exactly their relationship ends when she commits suicide...but i doubt there will be any question from anyone who saw this.<br /><br />it also was rather predictable for some fans as well with an evil soldier after a young man kills himself (though not quite so accurately). all we wanted to see was the ending.<br /><br />this being seen right now
0.000501
0.000491
If you can imagine Mickey
Mouse wearing a red dress that is so revealing it shows all of his curves in glorious detail, and he's doing battle with Godzilla dressed the same way then you won't be too surprised. A lot has happened to this cartoon since its conception on 3/12/56 but I've never really gotten into most of them.<br /><br />The story was about an evil robot king that had sent his minions after humans for reasons no one quite understands. After a rather violent confrontation between these two groups the king died which also resulted in a time dilation effect from hell, leaving mankind (and other species) as observers of events
Rooney and James Cagney together on screen then this is certainly one of those memorable combinations. 'The Crowd' may not be quite as exciting in comparison to the highly successful 1934 film, but it's still a good time-filler if nothing else. The main problem with this sequel does lie within the cast; they're both so wooden that I'm beginning to feel sorry for them.<br /><br />Even by today's standards (or any other modern) we wouldn't think much of these two actors performing a series of routine scenes which would likely appear in a TV sitcom...but hey, no complaints - these
0.004114
0.997771
I really wanted to like
this film so I looked forward for 1 hour and a half, but no, it is NOT FUNNY. The plot has nothing new going on: the man thinks he's one step away from God after finding an artifact that explains his special powers - what exactly? This kind of movie works if they are not supposed to be serious at all. Instead here everybody does get serious with exaggerated jokes about being "a bad person" or doing some crazy thing as well (for instance they had someone walk in front of you because they didn't think two people passed each other), which makes the whole experience pretty awkward.<br /><br />As
this movie. It was cute, funny and had potential for a true life story if done properly; however the plot is just plain lame on everything it touches.<br /><br />When I first saw the preview of "Hurt" in theatres I felt compelled to see all three installments (the original one with Gena Rowlands as Kim Basinger's sister who falls out of love with her father played by Danny Aiello); yet before that I should have known what kind of film to expect when I watched this latest installment: there were so many similarities between the third instalment at 2am(love interest), the
0.000486
0.000488
I have always admired Susan
Sutherland's acting skills. I can't say how this movie will affect you, but if that is the thing that bothers you in your life, then don't see it. Don't give in to temptation of seeing it and possibly hurting yourself from watching it! If you cannot get past one bad performance as a child who loves his mother all she had ever wanted was love for herself (which included some nice things coming out of her mouth), then don't see anything like this.<br /><br />If on the other hand what really makes one want to watch the movie is that Susan does amazing job with one character you truly wish didn
Sarandon for her performance as the woman played in "The Wedding Party". It is an excellent film. Although some viewers may find it a little sentimental, other viewings reveal something even more profound.<br /><br />It's no coincidence that this film has several people from my family listed as notable characters throughout its many scenes--including me. <br /><br />A man who seems to be all alone but has not yet reached his full potential goes on to become a successful real estate agent and becomes involved with two women of whom he considers infatuated -- one the wife (Luisa Lindstrom) of Mr. Bres
0.001062
0.998917
Warning Spoilers following. Superb recreation
of the original 1980's TV series, but with an added sexual gushage that is far too much for me to handle.<br /><br />The two main characters were very appealing despite some minor stereotyping by both actors which led up to their breakdown when a nurse turns into a sexy woman who also has the most prominent breasts ever seen on TV: It was like seeing the real thing come to life and it took away from the charm of the rest of the episode as I felt cheated outta it! The love story seemed more interesting than anything else in this movie because it was so unrealistic and predictable compared to others
of a very popular American rock group with a few minor changes and additions, this documentary focuses on the legendary "Breakfast Club" which ran from 1984 to 2003 and was perhaps the most popular teen-oriented television series of its day in history, featuring three groups: (1) The Breakfast Club, made up of eight teenagers at a rural school who spend their Sunday morning doing activities such as singing karaoke or watching a video rental store; (2) Friday's Last Fry, an off-the-cuff, often unintentionally funny social experiment where four adults have lunch together; and (3) Monday Morning
0.004166
0.998724
OK first of all the
title is misleading. The movie doesn't seem to be trying, but rather simply following a series of bizarre vignettes that are meant for laughs and fun.<br /><br />I won't take away from this, it's an enjoyable little film. I love movies like "the bodyguard" where they throw in lots of weird and odd characters into your lives along with fast paced drama and suspense.<br /><br />This one isn't as good though. It starts out at least ok by playing with a few sub-plot threads, which you could find more easily on any modern horror flick (such as "Saw"). In fact
movie is not made for serious film fans but only young ones who love cartoons. But, there are at least two things that this movie does well, it's characters and the animation itself.<br /><br />The main problem i have with the cartoon itself (not mentioning its quality). The plot has a lot in common with other "cartoons" like Garfield and other cartoon classics..<br /><br />What we get here instead of something new is one more 'comedy'. In fact I don't know how to call it better since these movies can be funny or they could even make you cry but either way they're very
0.99756
0.000778
Zu Warriors most definitely should've
had a trailer, and they needed to do something... other than that you could tell the script was put together by someone with NO clue what "special effects" are.<br /><br />In terms of animation it sucked like hell. Some scenes were just terrible (they really need to study how long people walk!) the fight sequences between the heroes seemed very rushed and unnatural. The ending wasn't bad but I'd have thought after all those years I wouldn't remember this one so....<br /><br />A 2/10 only because there is some good music here - in general though its painfully slow to watch!
made it a 10. This is one of the best animation sequels ever and its very difficult to find even now.<br /><br />But I can't recommend this so much because every scene was amazing.<br /><br />To me that's the only reason why Yuji Yamamoto kept this movie alive for such long years after they gave up on Animosity<br /><br />(http://www.animeserver.net/viewforum/25338/anime.php)
0.000486
0.99862
This is not so much
a film as more of an experience. I watched it over the weekend and was really impressed by the talent involved in its creation, both those who were involved (and had been to London recently) with whom I had a good time chatting about their experience at Moomins Live! in July or August 2013 and about this particular project: what does it mean to you? It all goes out into a whirlwind with no preconceived notions whatsoever.<br /><br />I'm sure that there will be people's opinion on "What Does This Mean?" since everything has already been made public; I'll leave comment for
about how bad The Matrix was, as it's a very good example of great directorial and visual effects.<br /><br />A nice simple story (which makes perfect sense), which doesn't take itself too seriously or spoil you for future movies. I can say that this has the 'B-movie' feel of Brideshead Revisited with more laughs than tears -- because really who cares when life sucks? It all comes down to whether there are other things in your life that suck besides being able to buy super-speedy cars while everyone else tries their best to hide behind one another on trains during rush hour?<br /><br />
0.998921
0.998833
Watched this on DVD in
December 2017, and it was good! After a first episode I got hooked, which led me to watch the second and third episodes too. Then there are some flaws: -The plot of "The Return" is very weak -The cast could use better casting. They're just too young (4-5) with an amazing beauty :O There's no chemistry between them. -In my opinion, one missing element from many Sci-Fi/Fantasy shows...A hero like James Treen did exist back then but doesn't have a name anymore.<br /><br />After all these shortcomings, you may ask yourself why
the middle of a 2 hour flight from Salt Lake City, UT to Dallas. I did not get an accurate view of what is taking place--it's like watching a documentary done by students trying to show just how close they are coming to having their own film school for young filmmakers!! It was good and it had some nice "big shots" on it but there were also tons of jerky footage that gave way more than hint as to who was who, where were we? What color it was. The cinematography would be described at times as pretty and at other shows us nothing except with two of his better scenes filmed through cardboard
0.000953
0.001257
"Spielberg loves the smell of
a murder scene. He is in love with blood, and so it must be said that he was as passionate when writing about The Texas Chainsaw Massacre as his film does.", I hear people saying.<br /><br />Well they may have had an advantage over me because I saw this last night, when my brother was watching.<br /><br />I can't tell you how happy I was to find someone else who was able to see some good things in 'Hellraiser', something not always possible for most fans. Sure there are flaws like gore (in particular a very unpleasant foot fetish at one point by Paul Dano)
blood!"<br /><br />I read this is supposedly about a young woman whose father, having just died, suddenly makes her believe that his body was infected by the devil. We're supposed to imagine a dead man's flesh spreading some invisible infection into living tissue.<br /><br />We are shown how these two women meet and fall for each other because they both have an incurable illness (a mysterious new disease) which will leave them with very little time left on earth before it eventually kills them all - I'm not even kidding! They must be really close friends if such things can happen in three weeks.<br /><br />
0.998386
0.000717
You may consider a couple
of films that are considered classic and one being THE ADVENTURE OF SPIT IN THIS ONE, (1964) by the same director,but what about this movie from 2008?!! I can think of no reason why anyone would not enjoy Spit! This picture is definitely worth watching.<br /><br />It tells how Jim Sturgess has been fired and is living with his fiancée but who seems to have a thing for her. She seems friendly enough even though they are supposed to be best friends - well she should know. So he gets himself a job doing odd jobs while taking
of the characters in this film as stereotypes (though not for me), but that is only because I know very little about them. The basic plot concerns a series of murders at a construction site, and how these people are trying to find out why they occurred.<br /><br />The acting does its job well enough; we have characters that seem natural ("you can't even tell who you're talking to!") and when your brain turns off it goes okay too. This movie has both humor and tragedy that could be applied in many ways.<br /><br />If there's one thing better than having some laughs then watching someone die. If
0.998904
0.9988
This is really terrible.<br /><br
/>The plot of it should make the film more or less worth watching, but all that I can feel are negative feelings about this movie. One thing to know: none of the actors seem serious and they don't do anything believable. At least, I have never seen such acting in a film by me! And another comment - everything looks amateurish, even if some parts look clean (like for example the black-and-white shots). <br /><br />I only liked one scene ("the ghost with the sword"), which looked interesting, although it's hard not wanting to see a more realisation from David Mamet.<br /><br
/>First of all, the music was horrible. The first five minutes they play a song by David Gray "I'm Going to Die in Vegas". It wasn't even his greatest hit but it's still embarrassing and pathetic.<br /><br />As for the movie itself... This movie should not have been made! There are way too many things wrong with this one that I could go on about but there isn't much here.<br /><br />1/2 stars outta 5<br /><br />If i had given more than 0 rating just because someone screwed up the script (like I did), well then maybe i would
0.000485
0.000485
Dude, really!!!! where have you
been all week? i mean....you know what, it might be a good idea to not spend more than five minutes reading these comments. my first reaction is that this was actually posted by another fan in 3d space. The only reason why i didn't say "stop wasting time here" is because i just couldn't resist commenting the number of times it says this movie as one of some of the worst I had ever seen.<br /><br />I can understand when they want to keep things very mild but don't make people waste their time laughing for no reason like this...anyway - since when did you think u were
been all this time? what has gone wrong with that thing?<br /><br />This film is the epitome of waste. The concept was awful. There were no characters and it had virtually nothing to do with any other genre or style so don't expect anything special in this "documentary". If they went out to one place to shoot pictures... why not hire a few extras instead of trying to pull a documentary out of nowhere??? They should be ashamed they did such an incompetent job on creating these fake footage of various people doing their jobs at the gym,etc..<br /><br />As for writing and directing.... uhh
0.000494
0.000486
Well, you know the rest!
It's one of those "you can do it too" types that make these kinds of films worthwhile for the whole family. I thought this was a really cute movie; there was some excellent acting from Marilu Henner and David Ogden Stiers in their very first film role ever.<br /><br />The story is about two siblings who have gone to live with their parents because father died while the mother was still pregnant (and thus unable to parent). One night when they are out camping at an unoccupied site called Chilly Falls Church of Christ where God used to hide away before His work was completed) one has a baby
This is really just a bunch of crap that should not be taken seriously because its so "chick lit". It's definitely no one issue soap opera but more like some combination of reality TV and t.v. show (that have been shown) to the point when they made them a bit too long as far what I mean in general it was good if for no reason at all.<br /><br />A lot could go wrong with this film on how many fronts it would fall short. The first being the writing: well maybe its better than most crap films out there and also it has enough things going around for a real thriller although i
0.998873
0.000499
I'm in Iraq right now
(on a suicide mission), and I am still amazed at the way Americans talk about what they "deserve". We hear some that say we get it, but then go on to state we are supposed to be thankful for our freedoms. Yes, there was freedom before we had them because of God's promises of justice and peace.<br /><br />The only thing worth fighting over is our self esteem - how many people will tell us if their parents took out loans while they were doing "service"? Of course not! But when we have these guarantees from those governments who made their decisions based upon faith, do you ask me why?
and i got to see some of the most wonderful sights you could possibly imagine. It is hard for me to write a negative review at any time because I know people have made this film so bad they've lost all empathy for it by the end...but there's always at least one good part, especially when making war movies.<br /><br />The best one being: The first movie with that long an instrumental score was "Ephesians".<br /><br />That has been remade better (so much else would be) without adding anything new or worse. That 30 minutes alone is enough to tell us not
0.012094
0.000523
"Valentine" is another horror movie
that the cult has got to call a classic. Directed by Don Siegel, the film tells about an elderly woman (Diane Keaton) who lives alone with her daughter and granddaughter. One day she finds something in one of the closets which makes her wonder what it was.<br /><br />The rest, you'll see for yourself! I must admit though, this is not exactly scary stuff...but there are some moments were worth watching: The shower scenes where we get to watch Diane playing around during it; When we look at Diane's house and hear her singing on the radio; when our heroine goes into a room that seems
that I don't really understand. Is the acting good? No, but it had a decent plot, and lots of good laughs (the film also has some quite creepy scenes involving people getting "valued").<br /><br />Also what do we know about Valentinianos? What is his motivation for killing Drorim's family and all these other random deaths over there? Why was he killed? And why are people afraid when they see him standing on top of buildings while wearing gloves as if it were dangerous to have naked fingers?! The whole story needs more explanation so far.<br /><br />In my opinion this one
0.997318
0.001105
There's one line that makes
this film look like it would go over well with a wide audience. It is, for all intents and purposes (and I use the term in the same vein as most people do when discussing films) The worst film ever made.<br /><br />I watched '13 Ghosts' after being told about it by an acquaintance who had seen it at the Toronto Film Festival back on January 7th. At first he took me to mean something else entirely; a horror flick involving demonic spirits but which did not portray any of my fears or qualms at all! I knew then that this guy wasn't serious. He was just showing
anyone who can't sit through this movie immediately assume he or she doesn't watch enough video: If you enjoy yourself when the film ends, make sure to be back around 1am on Sunday morning and let us know how long it has been! I'm going for 4 hours here. As a very curious person with few other interests besides watching movies, I've never heard of an otherwise competent actor who ever worked in such low-budget crap like this. And there just isn't any way someone could possibly convince me that they were not simply doing a job at work (and most likely under contract). No wonder so many people go out
0.000488
0.000594
There are so many puns
in this movie. This is the most annoying of them all, I'm sure.<br /><br />The only thing which kept me interested throughout was "Adele has a secret weapon". Well maybe not necessarily that - just something about Adele's music! And it does work... In my opinion.<br /><br />(but to be fair its one of those movies where you can't really see what happens until we've had enough time.)<br /><br />'Cause when i heard ADELE sing these hits....I literally wanted to kill myself!! The whole song is ridiculous (and totally illogical) and there isn
in this comedy, none of them really having any impact whatsoever. You want something to cheer about but no matter what happens there is not enough good things at all (like the 50's love affair and the relationship between Mr. X-Ray and Ms. Grady). This movie needs a better director because it was well written for most of its run-time I don't think it gets enough exposure.<br /><br />It also has no reason why you should watch it unless by chance you like how lame most other movies made that year were. It takes place during the last three years before D.D.'s time on the island when
0.000528
0.000499
There is no way to
be more honest with the critics or even at least one who has been in the industry for a little while now. I had heard of the series "WandaVision", but didn't really think it was as good because when I first saw it back in 2016, there weren't that many people seeing any other shows besides Star Trek (like my personal favorite), and this seemed like another show made just out of nowhere by Disney on Ice - which is how they would tell you it was going to be if your name wasn't associated with anything.<br /><br />When i watched them all individually (Star Trek, Friends
describe this movie. I saw it last week in Toronto, and thought that it was the best horror comedy ever made. It's a perfect balance of silliness with some real scares as well as good ideas - like 'Mischief'. If you have something else coming up (especially if your parents are around) then give this one the benefit of the doubt for being absolutely hilarious.<br /><br />But I just think that we've all got our prejudices, and sometimes certain laughs get lost because of them. This is exactly how it works here. You either find everything amusing or you don't care about any kind of laugh - until
0.998419
0.998783
In an attempt to bring
together two of Shakespeare's greatest tragedies into one, this production is like a cross between "The Legend of Hell House" and "Murder for Pleasure". The performances are uniformly good across the board. (No exceptions.) It was nice that there wasn't much in it about women at all -- except in the few speeches given by Mr. Tappin (I guess he doesn't speak) about how beautiful he would make his wife.<br /><br />This movie isn't nearly as funny or amusing. If you're looking for comedy but you want something really bad - like watching someone blow away rocks with their legs from about
the whole plot together, all you need is good casting and a decent script. The movie would be far better as a TV special of any genre except for horror flicks that have some weirdness going on.<br /><br />"Vengeful Angelica", was one such thing but since it's made with cheap looking stock shots no doubt its only getting bigger budget movies like this than ever before (in my opinion).<br /><br />(The other point in favor...the opening shot)<br /><br />It has one or two genuinely interesting moments though not enough to save the rest from being completely ruined by bad acting,
0.993526
0.000487
Firstly, there are some good
comments here. I actually did like the series so far and although some people have said it is terrible - well they're not my ancestors! But then again i've only been reading this book for a week at most as such comments don't really hold true to me. This movie had potential but ended up being quite dull.<br /><br />I can understand the reasons people would want to see one of Shakespeare's works in a live action film but even though I am a big fan of modern adaptations from films, I'm afraid that was pretty much just making things more difficult than should be required. Most of us wouldn't do it ourselves
points in this movie. First off, the music was excellent (I'll stick to my favorite song by The Beatles called "With a Little Help from My Friends" since I think it ranks right up there as one of the best songs ever composed). There were also nice sound effects and cool special FX that came together perfectly with the plot line.<br /><br />Unfortunately, however, I felt like something happened after about 1/2 way through the movie which didn't make much sense. It wasn't until around halfway though that they showed what happened at the end (which I enjoyed somewhat) yet it all just seemed very rushed -
0.000507
0.001053
This stalk and slash turkey
could not have been scripted much better. Even the soundtrack was superb. If you've never heard it, listen to your favorite band: I love this song for 1984. The whole movie is shot in black & white (the exception being "GHOST") but with tons of blacks and silhouettes which look like shadows behind some other object or someone standing against an oblique foreground which also seems as though a person are lurking somewhere within its shadow.<br /><br />I don't know what it was that made me watch this film - perhaps one more copy would do wonders! And if you still want the DVD with
which is the closest thing to a horror/thriller you could get in this decade. It was so bad I actually bought my own copy of it when we were going through its entire collection on DVD. <br /><br />I like movies as a way for people who've seen something that isn't good enough to see again but should be shown around (this would probably put most of us back in our old seats).<br /><br />However, at least half an hour into "Dressed To Kill" I felt myself starting to lose interest - not because there wasn't anything exciting happening or even terribly scary happening - just
0.998535
0.00049
Valentine is a horrible movie.
It's very boring and not funny at all, like most of BORING MOVIES ARE! It has some nice scenes in the beginning but it was over after half an hour.<br /><br />The actors do their best to play bad guys or good guys (maybe that makes no difference for me, because they are pretty decent) BUT NOBODY IS ACTUALLY HUMAN AND THE STORY just repeats on top of everyone else...<br /><br />What did i expect? A cute comedy where everybody behaves badly?? <br /><br />I don't really recommend this one. I wish somebody could give you something better so
It should be the first reason someone to give it the time of day: "The worst film I've seen in my entire life!" The only redeeming factor is that we have James Coburn as an actor, and he's good for a couple of minutes at most...not enough to save this mess.<br /><br />Coburn goes on long conversations with two women, all three getting a lot of acting lessons (except Mary-Louise Parker). His wife has no idea what she's doing but her husband seems to think otherwise. All these things happen without explanation or development either so you get pretty tired watching Cobburn tell
0.000484
0.000486
This movie was rented by
someone who liked to see every bad thing from an old Hollywood movie. It is really not a good film and I am surprised that many people have praised it on IMDb, but they had better things to do than watch this pile of crap.<br /><br />The plot revolves around two teenagers going camping together which gets in the way when one becomes ill (and thus has to get help immediately). Instead of saving him he finds a dead body at his place! How could such an idiotic twist occur? But even worse--his best friend comes along just as everything goes wrong. Their friendship seems gone until the final resolution and there isn't
a friend who actually found the concept to be extremely fascinating, he is currently studying for law in India and this one seemed interesting. So what could possibly make me want to watch it more than once?! I did not know any better when i watched first time around.<br /><br />The acting performances are OK but nothing special except that of Sanjay Kapoor as the main character played by Ram Gopal Varma which does hold your attention until something unexpected happens in the near future.<br /><br />I saw this on TV one night while at my local Blockbuster Video store because I couldn't believe how fast things were going before they lost
0.000486
0.002288
The Good: I liked this
movie. As a child when it was being shown on cable television in the 50's we had to wait an hour and thirty minutes for another showing or go without seeing much of this wonderful little film. This is not the first time that it has been re-run by Cable News Network, but they show one scene each day about 8 am as a start (or if you are lucky enough at night)so no excuse! We watched this just out of curiosity because even now we have three grown children of their own who love this film so every chance we get we see it together as we always do the same Christmas program from our
film from its beginning. It is not an action movie (or has a high shot) but more like the original 20th century silent film, "The Girl of The Golden West," as well as some modern westerns and noir films. There are no special effects or gimmicks to be found; it just takes place in Montana on what seems almost fictional time periods.<br /><br />I believe that the filmmakers have made movies about those historic places before because they are known historical sites and do not need much extra effort.<br /><br />><br /><br />"Noir" is the term applied by Quentin Tar
0.998845
0.9987
Its plain to see why
the new directors in Hollywood choose to focus on action films instead of true dramas. The actors are good (see John Lithgow, Ed O'Neil and Sean Connery), but I really can't figure out what's going on with these people...They have all suffered terribly from having movies that feature the type of actresses they do...they just couldn't stand it! So when a film about romance comes along as far as plot is concerned, their feet seem tied to the ground: Why?<br /><br />I saw 1964, A Soldier On Horseback - another one shot story movie; at least once in
this movie got such poor reviews on its website. First of all you have the 'Rotten Tomatoes' ratings. If it was just an average flick, what would they give? I mean if this is a big budgeted venture then i think we can afford lower rating's.<br /><br />But hey, it has some nice songs and interesting characters which make this film well worth watching!<br /><br />However...I had my doubts about the story lines at start but when finally it hit me what exactly were going on....And thats where it fell apart for me -<br /><br />(If this makes any sense
0.001198
0.000551
***SPOILERS*** ***SPOILERS*** Are all teen
slasher movies about boys having sex? "Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles" definitely is! My brother and I are huge fans of the TMNT, especially when it comes to wrestling. We would've given this movie a 10 out of 10 on our first trip down memory lane.<br /><br />The plot revolves around Timmy (a.k.a., The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) who must face off against both N-Rox and MasterShredder in order for him to gain the powers that will allow his friends back from their past with an old turtle and his special abilities which make him
thrillers scary? I would be the last person to say that. Not that there is anything too new and/or shocking, but we know what it means when something like this happens.<br /><br />In "Scare", Scott Bakula stars as Michael Deane, a teenager who suffers nightmares about his parents trying to kill him every morning so he can get revenge for them abandoning him on a deserted island during Christmas vacation. The good news is that in the wake of one or two sleepless nights...<br /><br />(1) he does see visions of Santa Claus and reindeer (2-3 times), and <
0.997646
0.006557
here was no effort put
into the final product, and even more so in bringing us to that point - this one fails as much or more often than it succeeds. <br /><br />this movie is just a little too corny for my taste, and I don't think many people will agree with me on what works here.<br /><br />I guess there's another good thing about this movie (and perhaps this other good thing about anything) because when all of them die at the beginning? You gotta be joking<br /><br />i love horror movies! but i can honestly tell you...there really isn't any true suspense, blood splatter stuff
into this film. it is painfully slow and repetitive in the script - you are not being asked to believe, as a reader/writer you have that ability; the characters walk off the screen before they can do anything.<br /><br />The acting was bad too (though there is one decent performance). what I thought was some great dialogue now looks stilted or pretentious depending on whether it has been read aloud from memory by those who played the other two parts of this script.
0.000494
0.000487
This movie in away was
very good. It's one of those films that you don't know what to expect at the end. This is certainly an exception.<br /><br />The premise is interesting and it has elements in common with classic exploitation movies of the time (the plot involves prostitution, cannibalism etc.).<br /><br />What made this film special though, despite being poorly produced, was its use of a female lead actress who proved herself capable of delivering great performances (in fact she did more for me than either Sam Neill or Richard Harris). The other two male leads were somewhat wooden as usual: I can remember having nightmares about Peter U
not bad at all. I watched it because of the popularity of that particular character on SCTV and while going through some channels, this is what popped up: 12 Days Of Christmas (Movie)... Oh my God!!<br /><br />I had to admit though, after watching a couple episodes from season 4, for me they were far superior then season 3 as well.<br /><br />'Twasnt me that woke me... It may be you have slept with your husband or wife! There are plenty more movies out there where the acting can reach beyond par - i.e., 'Sopranos',
0.99873
0.980299
Well the reason for seeing
this is that I like to see these sort of movies when I was 7 or eight years old. And I think it's a fairly good movie because there are some good characters and stories which you can enjoy with your family even if they don't agree on much, but not so many other Disney fare who will entertain kids in their own way.<br /><br />The story itself could have been improved by adding dialogue between different characters instead of having everyone say "Yeah" all the time, so we wouldn't be able to identify with anything them or any specific person else, although I'm assuming most people are adults now....<br
this movie is because I had heard people said that it was a very good movie. Well if you see it just get your hands on some of Robert Forster's classic films and take notes he really does has his moments too. It takes its time to pick up enough ground for an actioner at first but then once the scene changes are introduced, things start getting better.<br /><br />I have seen much better movies than this except maybe for Red Sonja from a decade ago. The plot line wasn't bad unless there were no special effects used in any way and it left me waiting more than 10 minutes until the whole
0.998892
0.000515
"In 1955, Tobias Schneerbaum disappeared
from Vienna. The most famous suspects were the Nazis but nobody could convince anybody that a Jewish Nazi would suddenly turn into an innocent girl with blood running through her veins," explains film director Peter Straumann in this atmospheric and very tense documentary about life after death (The Wandering Earth). In order to be accepted for medical research by institutions where genetic engineering is being practiced, it is mandatory that those people have at least one parent who died mysteriously during childbirth.<br /><br />"Life does not give you much," complains the young girl's father when his son attempts suicide: "I thought I was alone...And yet I still think he
from the streets of Munchen without a trace. It is assumed he was murdered by his former teacher Dr. Winkelmann after she had an affair with him."<br /><br />It takes a couple years to work through these characters and their back stories until finally we find out who the wacko really was.<br /><br />'Wandering Jew' has that wonderful'suspense factor,' so in my opinion it's better than most modern films today like 'Caged Fish.' I also think you get better insights into your own psyche and values when watching this film because they have more substance and make even lesser movies
0.998756
0.998785
So, where are the cannibals?
This is a 10/10 film. The plot and storyline are perfect; there's no wasted time or unnecessary lines. A couple of things I didn't like was that most people (like myself) think "Oh, so this guy died by being eaten". Not quite sure what to make of it. Another thing which annoyed me, on several occasions throughout the movie, were some little kids talking their heads off while watching parts at various angles of the screen.<br /><br />But i have come up with reasons not to rate this too highly: Firstly if you go in expecting something else from the movie then don't waste
I know that there are loads of them. The only thing missing from this film is a killer...and it's never to be found.<br /><br />But what really makes this movie interesting are these characters: one woman in distress and four friends with no idea how they got into such an absurd situation.<br /><br />The story takes place before the "20th Century Fox" era which was a great time period for horror films since we had little money at the box office and even less cash back then. There were few sequels as people just didn't make the kinds of movies they would show once more 5-
0.998855
0.998579
Well, where to begin? I
saw this movie because of the cover. The description was all "cool", but it's not that.<br /><br />As an avid science fiction fan (I have read 2 books on it), I had high expectations for 'Space Opera'. However, what began as a great concept fell flat from start to finish. <br /><br />I suppose if you are going by movies like these then obviously they will be good enough.<br /><br />It is one thing if people get their ideas out and just make them work without even trying or maybe even making an effort; however I felt the plot lacked the ability. If we
have been extremely disappointed in this movie. First of all there was no reason for Sam Rockwell's character to leave his wife after she left him with a new boyfriend. After some time the story changes and you don't see why this change has occured or why Sam was still having problems with his wife.<br /><br />Next, when Charlie Sheen is shot he almost appears to fall asleep while being injected... so then it suddenly becomes apparent that his father killed her parents instead! Is she now a mother!? This could be possible since he had already started dating the woman who supposedly got pregnant from the other man but if it does come
0.000487
0.000486
I Am Curious is really
what I call a "real" movie. It has all the usual characteristics that movies are meant to have, but also some new ones as well: the cinematography, where you can notice many moments when we don't see it on screen - they're so different than typical everyday cinema! The screenplay itself is good and there's no problem with any sort of plot development, which makes this film somewhat similar to other French films.<br /><br />The actors do their best in an almost identical way each time (even though I am not sure if that just happens because everyone takes part). For example, most of them behave very professional at
a good movie. I have seen it many times and this time i bought the DVD. So far, so great! But now that i am watching it for myself again after some 5 years of being totally bored by "American Pie" genre films (and frankly still not liking any of them), there are only two things that will convince me to watch all these other crappy movies: the sex or the humor.<br /><br />So in my opinion AIC was an average bad comedy but at least its good! Even if its hard to call everything from horrible as 'comedy'.<br /><br />But no matter how much
0.998926
0.000955
This film, once sensational for
a few moments is now painfully dull. It's hard to believe when the story begins with such great cast. But then we are left wondering what could have been? The characters may be interesting but none of them become real actors or even seem like people.<br /><br />The acting can't make up for a plot that has no development and so many predictable things happen in this boring movie. It seems most everything comes out of nowhere... A "heroic" action sequence which doesn't help the main plot anymore; another fight scene you just forget about and leave it there while trying to remember how bad the last was; a character that
its time (1947), is now well known as the inspiration of another film.<br /><br />Catherine Zeta-Jones was so young in 1953 that it would have been a shock even to herself! The main reason why I feel this film is so good (not great) is because what really makes it stand out from other movies like "The Black Cat" and especially other films that were made after, which just look dated by today's standards, is Jones' performance as Jeanne. While some people may find her too much old fashioned looking right off the bat - she looks much younger than
0.000484
0.998894
The plot line of No
was a bit far fetched for me. It wasn't that it wasn't bad, but there were enough "preachy", preachings to get tired quite quickly.<br /><br />In the end I enjoyed the movie nonetheless; it's just a nice little tale about one man whose life was changed by two people he met in another room. The story is somewhat similar to his other life experience with three men who came into his life through no fault his own making...<br /><br />'Night Train To Venice', 'A Night At The Opera' and even here...'Nocturne'. This movie didn't
Pain in the Face Of Death is simply awful. You know something has to be wrong with people if it produces such a terrible movie.<br /><br />I guess they decided that there was no one else out here so that they could go all-out on making this horror film but that's silly because you don't see any real gore...just blood, bones and skin (which I have never seen before) which leads me to believe that these types of movies are done for some kind of money. It seems like no-one even tries hard enough or thoughtfully put together any parts whatsoever to make ANY type of scare or fear when watching this
0.998038
0.000493
Hail Bollywood and men Directors
like Kader Bakshi & Rajkumar. "The Godfather" (1972), "Kabuliwala", "Yashraj Bandhaana" ("I'm from a small town"), "Sholay" are some of the memorable movies which have shaped Indian Cinema with their quality and humor that is timeless....and most probably to come again in 50's and 60'.....I wish these Films would come out on DVD..they need more efforts to promote them...there never really was any one man master director for years! These films should be re-made if they can, especially
who thought that they had a right to tell the world about life in India.<br /><br />The story of Chandu Kaushik is like any normal boy's dream. He wants to play cricket and then he gets his wish when his father asks him not to take a job as an actor because it takes up time for work with nothing else left over. So he has made a secret pact from childhood, which now comes true! <br /><br />A few years later, there are two main characters - Pooja Bhatt and Rishi Kapoor playing their roles well even though they don't make much sense at times.
0.998816
0.997953
This movie is traditional bollywood
comedy. Not in any way bad but not great either as to be expected, just okay and predictable! I think Bhai's acting needs some improvement because the script isn't that good compared to his previous movies. Though he did quite well with Chupke chusphe it was a bad one.<br /><br />The first time we get introduced to the characters they look like friends though they have lots of mis-understandings about each other including sex!<br /><br />Sonia SASAKARA'S DANCING - this scene has to be watched by every guy...it really proves what guys can do on stage..<
melodramatic.. The songs are catchy and the music video very much like a typical bollywood film. But there were some good movies done by director, Shahid Kapoor in which he made his debut role.He plays an anti-social kid who has a crush on girl at his school.This makes him stay away from her.When she tries to make the same for him this brings them together but ends up causing trouble between them.He finds that girls have feelings also...<br /><br />The plot line isn't original one can find in almost every similar genres of Bollywood films.Amparita Singh did it all better with Sallu Meh
0.000853
0.001848
I wonder if there is
a better excuse for this film than the title alone? It's funny to watch and yet I'd love to have it removed. If you were wondering, "Why did he write that?" or whatever, then I would say simply, do yourself a favor: don't bother.<br /><br />The plot of this short, in general...well nothing is really told about a young man who was once accused and convicted of stealing from his boss' warehouse by saying "No". He never made an attempt at redemption as long as there weren't enough questions unanswered. Until one day, being asked why he didn't ask the police when they
some way of putting in a tag or something but I found nothing else to do. The story is very weak, the acting isn't great (at best), and the only real interest for me was the idea that David Hasselhoff would end up at sea with all his clothes on. When this film's cast made it out from under their shipcaps or whatever they are called, you knew it wasn't gonna go well.<br /><br />And why? Who ever wrote or directed that script couldn't have written anything remotely interesting... I can understand someone making an effort to look like a high school drama class, but how about just
0.000531
0.000485
The TV guide calls this
series of movies "The Big Game" and the fact that it's really just a little different from what other similar ones like Star Trek: Deep Space Nine is part itself. This show was actually quite interesting, which may be why I found parts of it so fascinating to watch.<br /><br />It started with one episode that consisted almost entirely of Tom Baker as Captain David Banner taking part in an investigation into a recent case concerning murder but then everything suddenly stops making sense for 15 years because of some new things (we never know how much or when.) Then all sorts of characters come around who are only half-serious about their
movie "an interesting look at what happens to a couple's children when they leave their parents and move on". It doesn't do that. The film is just overlong, but the two main characters are so annoying it becomes tiresome. I couldn't stand watching him sing as though he hadn't heard everyone else singing for 20 minutes! No offense; I enjoy great song lyrics.<br /><br />I suppose anyone who loves music can make sense of this mess: it shows us how one small thing like a name change in your life can affect you forever...<br /><br />(Amen.)<br /><br
0.006757
0.00049
... but the keyword here
is'stupid', which I think shows how bad this movie was in comparison to some of the other work it's followed by.<br /><br />It isn't that there weren't things wrong with a film like this. The plot is stupid and overlong. It suffers from being far too long, as does its ending; it would have been better if there had just gone for an abrupt final climax - after all, if we're supposed to believe it can be said for films with less than 80 minutes on the screen (which is not many) then surely something important has happened during those first 79 seconds!
is 'artistic' and i can't see how that would be relevant to say "that piece was excellent". it's not like it had an obvious'story behind it'. for instance, what do you mean by using a mirror as the camera? thats just weird. in my experience with movies, only those whose characters have no life inside of them could use mirrors at all (unless they were making a serious attempt). besides that - don't get me wrong, there are some great examples like 'dune', but even if you think 'DUNE' isn't good enough, its still better than this.<br /><br />
0.000486
0.000612
Don't even ask me why
I decided to watch this film. To say that I loved it is a complete understatement! The first half hour of the movie was very interesting, showing us characters who actually had something on their mind when they did what "they" thought would be best for them: get an apartment and settle in with a partner or kids.<br /><br />However, once everything settled into place the story gets really ridiculous - just like every other "family comedy". Each person has all these problems - getting a girl (or better yet - becoming one) with everyone's approval; managing their career goals through work related activities such as working at a local
I went to the cinema for this film. It is a big disaster.<br /><br />The plot isn't that interesting and so there are almost no new points in it, nothing fresh or different and therefore I was bored before anything happened.<br /><br />And as for the actors? Are they actually professional people?! The only acting person worth noticing is Mr Toto (the actor playing Dr. Schuman) who has been very nice when i bought my DVD at Amazon.com... but he wasn't really good enough by myself! Even his wife had something else on her mind than her work :)<br /><br />So what
0.00049
0.000487
The French film "Extension Du
Système" is a rather boring thriller in the sense that it was not as interesting to watch or appreciated as a lot of other entries into this genre. At best, one gets bored and disappointed by what may appear an unnecessary plot, at worst, one gets distracted.<br /><br />In reality (and in theory), many people enjoy films without ever experiencing life on any form of daily basis -- hence why I thought myself fascinated with these short vignettes. A friend of mine enjoyed looking back over the list of films he had seen so far during 2004 and his comments gave me some sort of clue to my reaction
Ciel" has two very similar elements, both coming in with a bang. The first is the use of an interesting and inventive plot device to create suspense.<br /><br />I don't understand how people have commented on this film as being "tragic". It's not at all a tragedy but it IS quite dramatic. A woman who works for her deceased husband (who died years ago) decides that she needs his blessing before getting engaged - because if he doesn't approve - she may never get married! This sort of theme could be made interesting in any story and this one gets away from more cliched plots and instead focuses on
0.001829
0.998918
Two years ago, on Berlin
streets (I'm not sure it was Berlinian as they were all in black) I saw a poster for an unedited version of "The Last Temptation Of Harry Potter". It sounded like crap and I thought "Hey, I may be watching the same thing!". Unfortunately my expectation was very high. The plot is so ridiculously thin that by the end you'll actually feel sorry for Ron! Although that doesn't stop me from feeling slightly envious.<br /><br />So what if you didn't enjoy this film? What do we want from them?<br /><br />(Please note the original comments below are edited.)
largest public television station -- SWR 1 - I saw the documentary about the life of a Nazi doctor and his patients. The film had an excellent plot (the story was that in a village of eastern Germany from late 60s to early 80s some Germans tried to escape from the fascist regime by hiding out at home; but because there were not many places to hide they ended up being shot down over the sea). A man named Dr. Osten who worked with these sick people became infected himself during one particular time, as he got ill, dying before he ever made it back to Europe.<br /><br
0.0005
0.99782
Blank check is one of
the best horror movies i have ever seen. There isn't a lot too this movie to say and it can be easily mistaken for a slasher.<br /><br />Everything about this film is dark, sickly cool but with gore that makes you gasp in terror.<br /><br />I got scared by all characters so much I couldn't help my self looking at other channels but if your looking straight up for some awesome scary flick then you'll need look no further...<br /><br />(spoilers)This movie has the biggest blood spill on an American TV show (the only one after Scream and Friday Night Lights
the hardest movies to watch. My friends and I watched it as a movie school project, with our professor teaching us how not to look at women without any romantic appeal.<br /><br />All we were asked was: Can you name more men who have done this? A few months later they would get me to watch "The Exorcist" instead...<br /><br />Don't get me wrong, there's some really nice scenes but overall - if nothing else- forget all your ideas that are like *why didn't she say no when he kissed her* or something along those lines.<br /><br />This film has
0.998886
0.000742
Blank Check is a movie
that needs to be seen. I will give it 9/10 and I don't want my children watching it because the subject matter scares them so much.<br /><br />There are some moments where the plot doesn't make sense, such as the fact that there were two people in their garage who actually lived on Mars; which one of them was Dr Zito? It didn't happen at all! Also, why did they put an orange over the nose?? The rest of the cast isn't too bad either (not quite worth seeing but if you aren't scared or watch it with your kids), however: I really hope
that tries to combine all types of social problems. The main problem I have with this movie, however, is the ending (or lack thereof) - for example how can you make it into an action film if there are no fight scenes! As such they seem too forced and try too hard at different types of acting.<br /><br />This could've been a much better movie. 3 outta 10
0.998788
0.000497
I saw this movie once
and I thought it was a great film. Although it wasn't an award winning or Oscar type of movie, It had that same feeling as The Wizard Of Oz did; magical! It's really the only thing about the film which is not magical.<br /><br />Although its not quite as dark-like The Wizard of Oz (which probably caused all those negative reviews) but there are many things to be familiar with if you want to believe in such things...like when the bride wakes up....you may think she might go back into the morgue by herself...but you would never realize for sure until much later on in time.<
on tv. It was quite good, but it seemed kinda boring to watch and not too interesting...<br /><br />However, I've come to find that most movies seem very "boring" after awhile--it's the time when you want to get up in a few minutes just so you can move around until something exciting happens!<br /><br />If you haven't seen this one yet or missed the part of its release date (as i have), check out http://myanimelist.net/movies/difficult-of-the-odyssey/, because there are several short clips available from previous vidoes made by
0.998902
0.998351
The worst movie I have
ever seen. It was so bad that the first five minutes of it made me throw up, and then you know what? I gave it a 1 star because there's one thing good about movies: when they're bad, they can make even those extremely predictable (and annoying) movies entertaining.<br /><br />I didn't really like the film at all! In fact, some of my buddies who saw this in theaters said "that is terrible". The reason why: after two hours and fifty minute wait for an ending to come... you get bored fast and realize how bad it will be; but instead of giving attention to your
seen this year.<br /><br />Worse then any of the many horror movies that came after it, although some may think they are all pretty bad. <br /><br />Just to clarify - a man who had nothing better and no money than to make a movie about a giant whale in 1980 has made a sequel with his own name on it...which was not really very funny at first sight. Also you don't get new people joining him when he doesn't need them (the main character's friends) because there never were.<br /><br />There is a whole bunch of characters but most just make
0.000482
0.000501
Blank Check is easily one
of the most unwatchable and inept movies ever made. I know many people have been given copies, but don't expect a second viewing.<br /><br />A mentally challenged male patient at the hospital has no knowledge what the hell he's doing there when his doctor tries to force him into taking off pills for mental anguish that doesn't even help; you'll laugh during those parts in particular like someone who found some cheap DVD used tape from Walmart and bought it just because it was cheap. Another thing they did with such little budget money...how about letting a patient sit on HIS own bed and watch porn videos? That kind of
of the worst movies ever made. Don't judge it by my 7 stars...and I really can give a D for that movie.<br /><br />I've read reviews here saying that they were annoyed with every moment, but none of them had any connection to reality whatsoever. There was no real story in this movie: It doesn't even have much sexiness as well.<br /><br />Everything about this film turned into chaos from start to finish and there's only so many times you can take a scene like that out of "The Matrix" and put it in your home movie collection.<br /><br />This film has
0.000485
0.000487
I almost called HBO and
told them I am looking for a VHS copy of "The Last Waltz". There was, in fact no chance that someone would write this review without also writing the other one. Not only did it have some good points (and they were well worth mentioning), but their biggest error is in ignoring reality.<br /><br />While many may not be big fans of rock n roll music, you cannot deny how much a person who knows a little bit about the background (even if fictional) on which these movies are based will enjoy ("Greatest Night At The Circus", etc.). Also, any fan of classic Broadway shows should probably see
said I was watching this movie hoping it would end up in the worst possible way. It was too bad they never told me what happened on TV before or during the editing. The characters are awful, but you know that from the beginning when we first meet them; some of our favorite characters just aren't there anymore.<br /><br />You also get no feel for their personalities (they talk a lot - and act like they're talking about "how will this work?"); after awhile it's as if I watched people speak to one another as though they were speaking to each other... and none of us understood! And it took years
0.001805
0.000496
This movie is really goofy!
The actors make up a lot of the plot. You can see all sorts of similarities to other movies from when I was younger, so if you like comedies that have an unoriginal premise try looking for something new. There are no good jokes in this film and I don't think it even tries very hard. If you need some fast entertainment then rent this flick (it would be more appropriate for someone who has not been hit over the head by reality).<br /><br />The film started out great with Jack Black doing his usual stand-up bit but he made the character come off as unfunny at first due to being too young
I think that they were doing a 30s comedy when making this one, and their first couple of lines are actually quite funny...especially the part where Bill Murray is trying to talk his way out of getting fired. Unfortunately for him, he runs into several hilarious characters along the way.<br /><br />The plot was predictable until the very end....they obviously had some creative juices flowing after "It's A Wonderful Life" and decided they could make money on a cheap version in order to fund themselves while continuing to make quality movies like this thing. The casting of John Ritter and Michael Sarne may have provided some comic relief
0.000488
0.000597
A young boy comes into
the home of a local doctor. He's been given a case by his teacher, that is, he has to solve what appears on it 'to gain respect in their class'. After being accused for stealing, he goes back to visit his family...<br /><br />This story tells about a simple way through life: an ordinary day turns out as it will always turn out if one chooses wisely and takes things with all their hearts.<br /><br />Specially from children points of view this movie can be quite challenging because you don't know exactly how your life should look like after seeing such drama-like scenes or maybe at some point
a country where no one speaks English (a fact I don't know). He is told there are hundreds of tribes, and most do not speak the same language as Europeans...but it doesn't matter. The boy becomes their leader for a day and learns how to use knives and weapons.<br /><br />What's unique about this film in my opinion? It features a man who fights with his hands and nails but does so without making himself hurt; he cuts up the dead. I'm surprised that neither "the real" gangster nor any other famous American director would have done anything like this; if they hadn't seen something similar
0.998568
0.997509
Bad Actors, bad filming, choppy
dialog and weak dialogue are not enough to give this movie a real chance in the world of movies. This movie is just pathetic in terms of what we would expect from it.<br /><br />It's pretty easy to figure out why people like this movie - 1/2 an hour long. And that was so much for someone who can act (and get away with the crap he does), there has to be something else about acting skills than just "acting".<br /><br />I want more, please! The only thing I liked in this mess were two very good actors: Paul Toal & Tony Riva. It
and inconsistent sound. No story whatsoever. It is a comedy, but it seems really cheesy with its silly dialogue that has no point in being witty; rather lame jokes, stupid dialogs...etc.<br /><br />My friends are talking about this film as I sit on the sofa enjoying my coffee watching the news (a terrible day) while sitting next to me and I keep thinking of it, thinking about how awful it all was.<br /><br />'Oh God' one said<br /><br />I am laughing too hard! <br /><br />It's not even worth recommending you watch at home, especially when they made your own
0.000484
0.000486
Bad plot, bad dialogue, bad
directing and no script.<br /><br />I don't see any redeeming quality at all in "The Last Picture Show". I've heard a lot of people rave about this film. Maybe it will be remembered for its camp factor but that's the last thing we should do now that there are more intelligent movies on offer with less than half as much budget...<br /><br />(spoiler) If you liked this film then maybe try one of these: The Nanny (1974), Dumb and Dumber 2 or 3.<br /><br />'Last Picture Show' is just another example of something
acting, and a stupid villain. And the end.<br /><br />I'm usually all in favor of action movies which are better than B-movies but this is simply bad. The special effects weren't even bad enough to attract attention for laughs. <br /><br />The only one redeeming thing about it was Jessica Stroup's very brief appearance as a stripper who gets invited into the casino because of her mother being killed by the villain. This woman isn't funny either - she just doesn't belong there at all...and the movie goes on from that point.<br /><br />If you have nothing else better watch this
0.000482
0.000485
Larry Buchanan. Yep, same guy
who screwed up his first book and made the stupid mistake of having a little cameo as himself in another movie that turned out to be a huge smash hit (MADMAX). He didn't make it even though I watched all ten episodes or something! So, now he's making bad movies on his own time while going off in completely different directions by trying everything but the one. The acting was not very good...even for someone with some good acting chops like myself because none had any chemistry between them at all.<br /><br />Anyway, they did give me money so maybe this would have been better if there wasn't an annoying love
who made the 1980's "Blade Runner", who also put together a terrific 50th Anniversary Special ("Slaughter on the Grass"), and now has his first new film in years (this is an adaptation of a short story by Richard Bachman). I've been following the development this past year for years; with everything that was coming out to be considered trash movie fodder (the obvious reference of the opening title sequence are still there: you see them), it seems like a big gamble.<br /><br />I must admit right off, what they did here had me questioning whether this is going to even make
0.000502
0.007367
what ends up killing this
movie is a little wordy narration at the beginning, which I am not sure what was intended since it has some really cheesy lines that could have been left off, and as for the rest, well they don't give anything away. so what do we know about the first 4 episodes? nothing much, besides the fact you got to meet lots of famous friends, where all are in their prime years. So lets take a look at the main characters: -Dr. Jack O'Brien (I think its said he's dead) His only problem is seeing his ex-wife with someone younger than himself... This leads us to him & Dr
movie is all of its potential....it was a fun and thrilling idea...but to be able take it further and go into deep waters instead of the light. The script for some reason failed.<br /><br />The acting sucked, especially from Robert Downey Jr who had no chemistry whatsoever with any of these women. In fact, his one scene in town seemed like he never even tried at all.<br /><br />My friend saw her as a woman that could stand a little bit more. I though she fit almost perfectly because unlike him they were both so well casted<br /><br />(I agree that Lacey Chab
0.000934
0.000489
Not to be confused with
the other movie that i've watched this week called "Jubilant Sucker," but rather something much more interesting.<br /><br />This film was an unorthodox take on a genre known for its heavy female characters. It's essentially 3 story lines, which lead straight into each others' legs (and beyond) before we get to the climax of our enjoyment of all three!<br /><br />I'm not sure if it has been done in the past or how long ago...but i have yet to come across any one movie ever resembling this kind of tale..except perhaps Judd Hirsch and Anne Bancro
"The Devil's Voodoo," which is the same guy making a video, this movie really gives two thumbs up. Not that it has any special message or deep meaning; it may seem somewhat lame and stupid at times for many viewers, but then again so does life sometimes.<br /><br />There are only two big reasons why you'd want to see this on cable TV: One - because I just watched it tonight alone! The other- AKA if your not interested in watching another crappy b-movie<br /><br />In spite of its 5.0 rating (somehow it came through without anything negative), if there
0.998801
0.998752
After reading the book, I
can see how good it is - but only after having had my own children. There are two aspects of it that struck me as particularly disturbing: (1) How one could treat human life and future generations more unfairly than the others; a concept brought home by the death of my baby boy just 3 months later in another hospital bed when he was given up to go on his second birthday instead of being put down for adoption.<br /><br />I have always been against euthanasia- not because I am pro-choice or even anti-fatherhood, but because so often there seems no real consideration at all for our loved ones'
was expecting to enjoy "The Last Temptation of Christ" a lot more than this film.<br /><br />It's an awful movie. The acting is terrible and so is the plot! There are no surprises in it (they only have them at the end anyway).<br /><br />I'm not going through all my pain that everyone else did - for me, watching is as far from enjoyment as possible. But even if you can ignore its boring story-line there will still be a problem with the ending which leaves a huge blank... Like every other Christian film out there!<br /><br />This one could use some
0.998222
0.000488
I read the book and
I like it very much.The acting in this movie is fantastic. This was a pretty good script.It really surprised me when they ended up having them fight over "Buckaroos" again,what with his father always coming back to earth (from hell) for Buckaroo's funeral.In the end there wasn't one scene where you knew exactly what would happen next.That made watching it even more fun.I enjoyed the storyline.Also,the whole thing had some humour. It also has a nice setting--a small town.It can be easily watched and understood without the full knowledge of the film beforehand.However,you need not have any experience of
was quite taken with it. This movie is terrible! It seemed like they used every single cliché imaginable for this story about a woman looking into her future, not being prepared enough for that...and to top all of that off there are no believable characters who can be trusted.<br /><br />A lot of people I know love this movie so what's wrong with me??<br /><br />Well after having seen this film on Netflix as well while waiting until my next day class because its been way too long since last one, i decided to give it another try.<br /><br />Now i have absolutely no qualms about
0.998892
0.000484
I've seen my fair share
of horror films at the box office during 2008; I'd say they're all rather average. This one however stands out as a fairly unique piece for being both a remake and an adaptation.<br /><br />The premise of the movie is that two guys are in Vegas planning to kill a girl with whom these men have been having a falling-out--but when they meet her, she tells them how lucky they really are -- that their lives could go back together if only they just had sex after killing each other. <br /><br />(This plot line has also existed before on numerous occasions).<br /><br
of crappy flicks and I don't think it's possible to film anything, but this was definitely one heckuva bad movie! It had absolutely nothing redeeming about it whatsoever. A few interesting points come into view:<br /><br />First thing that struck me is the name 'Sucker Punch.' When a writer says these types of things when you're writing something they might as well not be around - he must have been on crack or some other chemical concoction. It just goes to prove that good minds do indeed produce some very bizarre movies...<br /><br />The acting was dreadful from almost every character in the story
0.998435
0.000486
Paul Armstrong is a liberal,
anti-science, self-deceiving psychopath and a total waste of time to watch this movie. He's got the potential for great entertainment but ends up in a bunch of stupid moments where his lies make him look like an idiot.<br /><br />This guy has a mental capacity that was never developed by any other actor...if he were to work hard enough as long as Hollywood doesn't shoot this kind of rubbish it would be OK (I hope). Not even his character could save this dregs of film making from being trash on video disk!
social climber trying to get in touch with his more conventional friends who live the life of ordinary Americans. A successful businessman has died and he wants all that this world was worth: money!<br /><br />To try and earn enough money not only for him but also himself, Armstrong meets up an ex-boyfriend (Lionel Shumlin) whose fortune does seem to be working itself out.<br /><br />This movie tries hard; even though it isn't exactly mainstream it manages to draw you into its world so deep your heart knows how it should go on from there! One can feel completely involved...<br /><br
0.000487
0.998811
JUST CAUSE showcases Sean Connery
in an absolutely terrific performance, along with the entire cast. In his first big film role since "Casino Royale", Connery plays a British spy who wants to kill himself for revenge on those responsible for the death of his girlfriend in one of Spain's treasured archaeological sites during World War II.<br /><br />I was captivated by the way he played the character and also liked John Carradine - another wonderful action hero that I don't often get the chance to watch (well...with his long hair).<br /><br />(If you haven't seen it yet...) THE RIFLES OF SHADOW is a
at his very best...<br /><br />At the beginning of the film, I was anticipating a simple action movie to be had on a rainy day. Instead it turned out to be one that gave me an opportunity to watch this old man do what he does best-act for you in front of screen and entertain.<br /><br />(If you are into sports or movies about professional fighters then you will appreciate these scenes much more than most people realize) <br /><br />And although this is definitely not the first time we have seen his character appear in any mainstream films (1972's Out Of The Suite),
0.998904
0.998916
The form of the film
"the world is a cruel place" has to be noted that it's not as good than most other films in its genre like Dostoyevsky novel. The main thing are there actors who give best performances (Dennis Quaid, Jason Lee and Hugh Laurie) so far i can say this was worth watch.<br /><br />Firstly you need to remember when watching film you have to think about what happens and where to stand for every scene then try to understand how everything will end up - if it would go well or bad but always do your own analysis! When watching the movie at home start talking with friends about ideas
is a bit disappointing, it did not appeal to me. Some scenes were good and some bad which really annoyed me.<br /><br />There are no actors who could have given their best performance in this flick. Their expressions would've been enough for every other actor to do that job<br /><br />(although I liked Piers Morgan playing Inspector) There was one scene in the beginning where she was showing her dress so badly (which should not be shown) which made it all over. Her character musta tried out many clothes but never got changed with such poor quality stuff!<br /><br />There are 2 people in
0.998901
0.000501
Just Cause is one of
the best thrillers I've seen in 2013. Although it was pretty short, not enough time to get my head around everything going on, this could have been way better if the film makers had just spent more time really giving us a glimpse behind their scenes.<br /><br />The story of why you are who you are isn't particularly new and while there's an abundance of plot twists here for those looking for a fast paced thriller (you don't need me reminding you), some people will probably pick up some other things along the way instead. Here's mine: Why did these two men go into such great detail
the finest crime movies ever made. To me, it was the most unique and thrilling thrillers to watch since The Postman Always Rings Twice with the perfect combination between mystery, thriller and comedy - it's a 90% masterpiece.<br /><br />The script by Anthony Minghella has been well received in his own time but now he continues this trend and proves that good writing can create even better cinematic productions! Even if you don't like reading the book or watching it on TV there are not much differences in plot here! I think the movie is quite different from the usual ones; sometimes they follow lines and sometimes they play
0.998669
0.99892
Look carefully at the wonderful
photos and feel how much love you got from those pictures. They are so well crafted that, after watching them I think "I really miss having good moments with my mum". What do you say? It's been 7 years since we had such a beautiful moment together in Italy!! This was probably one of our best days together.<br /><br />It takes two people to make a family...<br /><br />Thank You Julee!<br /><br />(PS: That is actually just me! :-) ) :-)) :) <br /><br />Awwwww!!! Such an old heartwarming video....what great
photographs on this site that show in 20+ countries around the world. The story line is as simple and innocent as a boy's dreams, one of which will find him on the cover of National Geographic Magazine! It seems he loves his family more than anything else or believes they are better off if all kids live by their fathers strict discipline.<br /><br />The movie shows how easily it would happen when these guys got involved with organized crime but found themselves unable to resist and soon realized life was too much for them; that life without fatherly love can lead only to sadness instead of happiness. This film should not be viewed nor
0.998906
0.000718
As other reviewers have noted
this film is a very bad parody of the classic "The Prisoner". Although I find it hard to believe that an Australian-made movie has been called such when its script was written by an ex-convict in 1974...<br /><br />Even considering all that, however, there are at least two points of interest: first is that so many people actually enjoy what must be considered rubbish nowadays; secondly as some of them point out, there's still plenty of humour here.<br /><br />To say no one likes "Prisoner" would do well. Its story, though set on a prison
the film looks and plays as much like a TV show. The characters are often played by people who look too young for their ages to be actors! They were just trying out for this role - even if they weren't very good at it.<br /><br />A movie is really only made great when you see one of your leads get his moment (and then he'll regret it).<br /><br />Somehow I believe that there was no audience in place during "The Great Escape" and every person who sat down was completely cut off from any information about where things would take them, which I guess was a bit disturbing
0.000504
0.000785
Seems that the cast should
have been younger and more well versed in their art. This movie did not make me laugh or smile all together, but was so cheesy I couldn't stop looking for something else to take my eyes off.<br /><br />This type of film is made when people try to get themselves a quick buck by making an average amount of money with little effort on the part of the filmmaker. A great example being The Princess Bride as they use the same formula over again. But this fails miserably here since there isn't much about it worth talking about. Everything looks like a bad 80's sitcom set to music.<br /><br
be a bit tighter here, to make the film more believable. I guess it will take some acting out of them just for laughs.<br /><br />The plot is OK although maybe there could have been better music and less boring scenes like when they are trying to rescue the old man from his "tapes".<br /><br />(And you can't call this drama).<br /><br />'Cousins' was certainly worth watching because of its performances in my opinion (Gaelan & Patrick) as well<br /><br />But if you expect your typical comedy movie or a sad story - skip this one! ;-)
0.000486
0.000599
1st watched 2/16/2002 - 4
comments The only reason I gave this a full rating is because it's so good, but that just puts people off seeing it. There are far more memorable horror movies out there than the stupid zombie ones we see every other week in TV shows. If you love movies like The Hills Have Eyes or Evil Dead then this movie should be on your list of favorites.<br /><br />It has some really funny moments and good gore. It isn't all gory though! This film made me laugh about once while I was watching it when zombies were running around. But if they had been running around carrying little plastic bags filled with popcorn instead
Next to "The Naked Eye" is a classic film that will always have my attention. A great movie full of drama, intrigue and action! As with most good films, there are parts where you just don't understand it all but once you finally figure out what's going on, everything makes perfect sense in your mind.<br /><br />This film has an original look (if the color scheme sounds familiar from the first half-hour or two) that I thought was very effective. There were too many camera angles thrown around, although even if they weren't necessary I personally think one angle could've been better than
0.998472
0.998919
The performances of Fishbourne (who
also seen in "Falling Through" as Dr. Martin), and Koenen are superb....and the plot is very clever--how about this- a man with terminal brain cancer gets to decide whether he wants his body donated or left intact, but first, we're given some clues that tell us what kind of person this guy must be. I love Fishbourne...he always looks like someone just out of high school and can act! Also, if you do not recognize any members of your family from around town--don't worry there won't even be flashbacks!! It was actually sad watching how quickly everyone dies. Some
is a very nice guy) and DeNiro aren't all that impressive, but I enjoyed watching the movie because some good ideas were presented.<br /><br />For example, why not have the cops chase the bad guys back to their premises? The premise seems interesting. Then again it might be tempting for anyone who feels like getting in trouble with the police to pretend they didn't hear them or just make up a plausible excuse so that you can be released on bail after an hour's detention by your agent. However, this would only add a certain level of seriousness that could help solve many cases where one person has been murdered and no
0.998788
0.996694
A pot - boiler if
you will but it's better than a kettle. Lots of interesting characters to go around, from the "old" family who want the new life that comes with their retirement... and there were many! The story has elements that could be applied today as well; a lot like the old adage about having one of everything.. all right I've missed out two categories but have added in at least three or four more!<br /><br />My favourite thing was certainly the fact he did keep trying to get on with his own way too. And whilst its often said that we cannot afford this kind-of character then just take another look at our
you will. It's not bad, but the acting is really very good and believable.<br /><br />When I first saw this movie on TV 15 years ago (it was only one of hundreds of movies for kids on Cartoon Network during that time) it made me want to see more.<br /><br />(Though at age 20 the scenes where Charlie Brown dies didn't make much sense.)<br /><br />'Scooby Doo!' might be called 'The Scoobz.' They are a bunch of young kids living in New York who find out about some kind of alien creature causing problems with their
0.998811
0.998827
This movie is a crappy
version of the legendary "Serpico" by Clint Eastwood, in which he plays a cop that investigates something very important. He finds out about an evil gang going around and killing people because they're playing football instead of hunting.<br /><br />In this version, played very well by Danny Glover (who was really good as always), it's not that much different to what happened on Serrin Peralta (he has nothing interesting happening) and all these characters are being used for special effects rather than any other thing. I have no problem with using special effects and CGI to create a fake urban environment, but here it
bad remake of a good flick. This one has very little plot that's not common in the 70s. A cop who is involved in crimes and can't seem to catch them all (just like cops from today). His old friend dies tragically at work because he didn't get over his girlfriend being dumped by her husband. The young man starts having sex with prostitutes... or rather, she sells him out so he'll stop killing people for money. After getting a tip on a woman murdering men as they're driving around town we watch this lead guy go after it only making sure he doesn't kill anyone. And what
0.000501
0.000493
This is just a case
of the people who don't give it too much thought putting up this lame film. I've seen quite a few 80's horror films (and in no way am I comparing my comments to those made by anybody else here) and can honestly say that 'The Final Days' was one they would rather not watch due to some of the horrible effects. The director makes attempts at humour from time to time but only for a second - there must be another movie with better material which deserves to be released as soon as possible or you will spend most, if not all your life hoping you won't have to rent or buy them.<br
of someone who thinks that he can make an awful horror movie. The original movie was good, it had a few creepiness moments and the final scene still makes me cringe every time I see it.<br /><br />Then comes this movie where you'll have to sit through hours without seeing any scares at all until the end (even though the plot does contain several pretty creepy scenes).<br /><br />I wish i could give less stars but in order for me to be satisfied there must be at least 5 people that hate it too so its not possible. But anyways: DON'T WATCH IT AND YOU WILL DIE!!! Just
0.000497
0.000488
Because IT IS, that's why!
<br /><br />I have enjoyed the first three films in this series but only managed to see "Ran" and it made me want so badly for more. And after my viewing of its predecessor I couldn't help feeling a desire to know where ALL this took place.<br /><br />As others mentioned on here the third film is really rather predictable: There are no surprises. You have been warned!<br /><br />However....<br /><br />The acting has always been good...you can tell from what happens with Rani. She is wonderful as she tries desperately not to do anything stupid because apparently when you don
10/10. Yes I have seen it many times but each time I watch it and the first few minutes are so bizarre...you forget you're watching a movie....that is until one moment where something happens to your camera...and then this "troubling" scene becomes such a satisfying tease for when you do see what happens in the second half of the movie. It does get kinda weird at some points because they use the word "cute", as if there was any redeeming qualities whatsoever - not even funny moments were found by the makers. This makes me wonder how much money has been spent on making these
0.995807
0.998663
This can't be Mandy Schaffer's
first movie after the success of "Tess". This is a bit of film criticism and I will start on that. In its early stages, Sappho was supposed to be something like the 20th Century Fox version of Broadway musicals with songs about love ("Let Me Be Your Decision", for instance) rather than an adaptation from William Shakespeare's play.<br /><br />It failed at its target audience; it only managed to attract a few viewers who actually paid attention. However, this did not deter Hollywood. So they followed suit by adapting all these great scripts into motion pictures.<br /><br />Mandy Schaff
last foray into the acting world. It sure doesn't look like it, either.<br /><br />As a viewer of "Nuts", I was excited about this film from beginning to end. What is supposed to make someone watch such a film? Who knows. Maybe you got interested by looking at an interesting cover and thought "Hmm... maybe I could write that on my resume." <br /><br />Or perhaps your first reaction when you came across a movie trailer with no dialogue or script and nothing written as instructions in the captions is something called excitement? Or are these simply not good enough reasons to see anything?<br /><
0.965751
0.000723
Let me be really clear
I have NEVER been to America and it seems that my friends who have are the ONLY people in New York i know going there because they're not from outside of USA.<br /><br />They seem so excited about having visitors, when none exist out here for any reason except maybe one or two people who happen across their way on the bus. The only ones around us all we see is tourists walking back and forth to work places like ATMs and fast food restaurants <br /><br />This past summer, during our "staycation" in NYC (as opposed to what was typically called a vacation), i had no intention for them
I saw 40 years of American history with this film--1936 is only one part. I'm a former movie collector, so my memory wasn't always perfect in the "great" and "hilarious" times (but still very good!). This was just too dull for that, even if it had been done by someone who can write great dialog.<br /><br />I have trouble believing they needed such an excuse to produce such rubbish as this; but unfortunately many people think this review should be considered proof positive, at least until more Americans are allowed to see how utterly inept filmmakers can make an absurd
0.000971
0.000486
A truly, truly dire Canadian-German
collaboration. All three of those cast were superb - the German actors played more like real people (their accents and personalities are absolutely authentic) than a bunch of Hollywood-style schtick. The direction is excellent; for example, I just noticed in a few places during shots that we get the same background images on screen twice within the context: once after scene change but only later again when it comes to showing other scenes being shot at an identical frame-rate.<br /><br />But as far as this production goes... well...it's pretty much complete garbage from start-to-finish. It had potential with such competent performances, and yet they couldn
co-production that is almost as bad for its political underpinnings as it is for the quality and execution of either film. German director Rolf Gluck's (THE GUN AT BARCELONA; THE CURSE OF KATAWANTI) first time effort in Canada was a disastrous disappointment.<br /><br />In this case he decided to combine the genre elements: gangster revenge on the part of one American soldier returning home from World War II with his cousin who has inherited 2 million dollars - which he never uses but leaves behind a pile like cash! And I have been saying all along what an absolute waste of
0.000486
0.000497
This movie is so bad,
it's good. Its got the best music of any film and one can almost taste what might be in store when they're finished shooting it.<br /><br />One guy with a car makes plans to make his boss, an old hippie monk (very similar to 'The Exorcist' in its treatment of religion) do some research about Satan and God. They meet at night by walking down the street but have trouble getting out of the town because everyone hates them, including church officials, who find their clothes on the floor after dinner shopping for groceries.<br /><br />They keep talking through their problems until Satan appears dressed as
it's nearly unbearable. As the title suggests, the main characters are both women (and one girl with a lot of curves and pretty face that we all know can't get laid) who decide to do an extreme kind of self torture... By lying on their backs in some sort of pain inducing sleep, sucking on these painful maddening neck wraps... <br /><br />The actors give poor performances as well, the jokes are lame( I was laughing at someone saying "i thought i knew" when really he just said his wife had already lost 51 pounds)...<br /><br />If you're into this type of
0.000636
0.000487
Oh man. If you want
a bad 80s movie, rent this one! And if you're trying to convince me it wasn't made by some guy who loved his girl and was ready to do anything for her then I don't know what's going on in your head.<br /><br />Donnie Wahlberg (he still can be that good), Rob Lowe...why wouldn't they play these roles well? The plot: two friends are forced to take the kids of an evil cop home when he is called out to investigate suspiciously unrelated deaths from last year. After being beaten up by the police several times themselves, the cops have turned down their
to have fun and watch bad movies... then this is it! I rented just so i can see the last of them before they are all retired because a few were really good and I didn't know if one of them would fade away into obscurity or never make it in theaters ever again.<br /><br />What happened here? After about 20 minutes into the movie, your brain kicks into gear telling you that this story has no point whatsoever until the very end.... The plot is not even coherent with regards the other characters' names (especially since both Charlie Savage's name was used throughout the film). As for the acting,
0.000625
0.000487
I am guessing the reason
I watched this is because of it's title. But, what started off being a comedy ended up as another very poorly executed attempt at making something truly great out of what could have been one decent script.<br /><br />As mentioned in the previous comment, the film makes reference to many 'lost' movies that don't exist anymore but were shown once upon a time on TV. This was most likely done by means of computer generated images (CGIs) where they would make references to such movies while showing allusions only to real people and places who never even existed during their supposed era.<br /><br />This concept made me start
why it's only got one rating out of five compared to 7-9 is because most people have seen this movie. <br /><br />I've never been a fan of horror movies, though I do like some scary ones and I just couldn't figure how you'd get past someone being burned alive during an earthquake. However, if for example we could all understand that there are good points in life (not necessarily by accident) AND bad points too then my feeling would change.<br /><br />This isn't any decent horror film at all but nothing really new either. It has the basic formula: Two guys die from exposure
0.000485
0.000498