size_categories:1K<n<10K format:parquet modality:tabular modality:text library:datasets library:pandas library:mlcroissant library:polars library:distilabel region:us synthetic distilabel rlaif
---
size_categories: n<1K
dataset_info:
  features:
  - name: question_id
    dtype: int64
  - name: question
    dtype: string
  - name: options
    sequence: string
  - name: answer
    dtype: string
  - name: answer_index
    dtype: int64
  - name: cot_content
    dtype: string
  - name: category
    dtype: string
  - name: src
    dtype: string
  - name: instruction
    dtype: string
  - name: thought
    dtype: string
  - name: output
    dtype: string
  - name: distilabel_metadata
    struct:
    - name: raw_input_thinking_l_l_m_generation_0
      list:
      - name: content
        dtype: string
      - name: role
        dtype: string
    - name: raw_output_thinking_l_l_m_generation_0
      dtype: string
  - name: model_name
    dtype: string
  splits:
  - name: train
    num_bytes: 9026275
    num_examples: 1000
  download_size: 3882485
  dataset_size: 9026275
configs:
- config_name: default
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: data/train-*
tags:
- synthetic
- distilabel
- rlaif
---

<p align="left">
  <a href="https://github.com/argilla-io/distilabel">
    <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/argilla-io/distilabel/main/docs/assets/distilabel-badge-light.png" alt="Built with Distilabel" width="200" height="32"/>
  </a>
</p>

# Dataset Card for meta-llama_Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct_thinking_mmlu-pro_20241017_023744

This dataset has been created with [distilabel](https://distilabel.argilla.io/).



## Dataset Summary

This dataset contains a `pipeline.yaml` which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the `distilabel` CLI:

```console
distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/dvilasuero/meta-llama_Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct_thinking_mmlu-pro_20241017_023744/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
```

or explore the configuration:

```console
distilabel pipeline info --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/dvilasuero/meta-llama_Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct_thinking_mmlu-pro_20241017_023744/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
```

## Dataset structure

The examples have the following structure per configuration:


<details><summary> Configuration: default </summary><hr>

```json
{
    "answer": "D",
    "answer_index": 3,
    "category": "philosophy",
    "cot_content": "",
    "distilabel_metadata": {
        "raw_input_thinking_l_l_m_generation_0": [
            {
                "content": "\n        Respond to the following user query in a comprehensive and detailed way. But first write down\n        your internal thoughts. This must include your draft response and its evaluation. After this,\n        write your final response after \"**Final response:**\". \n        Your internal thoughts won\u0027t be shown to the final user so use English for thinking and reflection and respond in the language requested or used by the user in the query.\n        User query: The following is a multiple choice question. Think step by step and then finish your answer with \"the answer is (X)\" where X is the correct letter choice.\nQuestion:\nAnscombe claims that an adequate moral psychology would include:\nOptions:\nA. a detailed understanding of societal norms and expectations.\nB. a comprehensive review of historical philosophical theories.\nC. the influence of personal experiences on moral decisions.\nD. analyses of concepts such as \u201caction\u201d and \u201cintention.\u201d\nE. the integration of religious beliefs into moral decisions.\nF. a thorough study of the subconscious mind.\nG. all of the above.\nH. an exploration of the concept of \u0027good\u0027 and \u0027evil\u0027.\nI. an answer to the mind-body problem.\nJ. an explanation of how free will is possible.\nAnswer: Let\u0027s think step by step.\n        ",
                "role": "user"
            }
        ],
        "raw_output_thinking_l_l_m_generation_0": "**Internal thoughts:**\n\nOkay, let\u0027s analyze this question step by step. Anscombe\u0027s work is quite influential in the field of philosophy, particularly in the areas of action theory, intention, and moral philosophy. She\u0027s known for her concept of the \"intention\" in her book \u0027Intention\u0027.\n\nFirst, I\u0027ll consider option D. \"the influence of personal experiences on moral decisions\" - Anscombe\u0027s work is more focused on the concept of intention and action, rather than how personal experiences shape moral decisions. This might not be directly relevant to her claims.\n\nNext, option E. \"the integration of religious beliefs into moral decisions\" - Anscombe was a Catholic and her work was influenced by her faith, but her claims about moral psychology don\u0027t necessarily focus on integrating religious beliefs into moral decisions.\n\nNow, let\u0027s consider option F. \"a thorough study of the subconscious mind\" - Anscombe\u0027s work focuses more on the conscious aspects of moral decision-making, particularly the concept of intention and action. Her work doesn\u0027t delve too much into the subconscious mind.\n\nOption G. \"all of the above\" seems too broad and inclusive, given the specific focus of Anscombe\u0027s work.\n\nOption H. \"an exploration of the concept of \u0027good\u0027 and \u0027evil\u0027\" - while Anscombe touches on these concepts in her work, her primary focus is on the concept of intention and action.\n\nOption I. \"an answer to the mind-body problem\" - Anscombe\u0027s work doesn\u0027t extensively address the mind-body problem.\n\nOption J. \"an explanation of how free will is possible\" - Anscombe does discuss the concept of action and its relationship to free will, but her primary focus is on the concept of intention.\n\nConsidering these options, I think the most relevant aspect of Anscombe\u0027s work in relation to moral psychology is her analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\", rather than the other options.\n\n**Draft Response:**\nBased on Anscombe\u0027s work, an adequate moral psychology should include a detailed analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\".\n\n**Draft Evaluation:**\nThis response seems to be on the right track, but I\u0027m not entirely sure if it\u0027s the most comprehensive or accurate representation of Anscombe\u0027s claims. I might be missing some crucial aspect or overlooking some other relevant connections.\n\nWait, let me consider another option.\n\n**Consideration of Option A:**\nAnscombe\u0027s work does focus on understanding how humans act and make decisions based on their intentions. And the concept of action and intention is closely tied to understanding how people interact with their environment and make moral decisions. This is precisely what a moral psychology should aim to understand: how people act and make decisions based on their intentions.\n\nWith this in mind, I think a more accurate response would include the analysis of these concepts as a central component of moral psychology.\n\n**Revision of Draft Response:**\nBased on Anscombe\u0027s work, an adequate moral psychology would include, of course, a detailed analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\".\n\n**Final Evaluation:**\nThis revised response seems more comprehensive and accurate. It directly addresses Anscombe\u0027s key contributions to the field of moral psychology and highlights the importance of understanding action and intention in this context.\n\n**Final response:**\nThe answer is D."
    },
    "instruction": "The following is a multiple choice question. Think step by step and then finish your answer with \"the answer is (X)\" where X is the correct letter choice.\nQuestion:\nAnscombe claims that an adequate moral psychology would include:\nOptions:\nA. a detailed understanding of societal norms and expectations.\nB. a comprehensive review of historical philosophical theories.\nC. the influence of personal experiences on moral decisions.\nD. analyses of concepts such as \u201caction\u201d and \u201cintention.\u201d\nE. the integration of religious beliefs into moral decisions.\nF. a thorough study of the subconscious mind.\nG. all of the above.\nH. an exploration of the concept of \u0027good\u0027 and \u0027evil\u0027.\nI. an answer to the mind-body problem.\nJ. an explanation of how free will is possible.\nAnswer: Let\u0027s think step by step.",
    "model_name": "meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct",
    "options": [
        "a detailed understanding of societal norms and expectations.",
        "a comprehensive review of historical philosophical theories.",
        "the influence of personal experiences on moral decisions.",
        "analyses of concepts such as \u201caction\u201d and \u201cintention.\u201d",
        "the integration of religious beliefs into moral decisions.",
        "a thorough study of the subconscious mind.",
        "all of the above.",
        "an exploration of the concept of \u0027good\u0027 and \u0027evil\u0027.",
        "an answer to the mind-body problem.",
        "an explanation of how free will is possible."
    ],
    "output": "The answer is D.",
    "question": "Anscombe claims that an adequate moral psychology would include:",
    "question_id": 11069,
    "src": "ori_mmlu-philosophy",
    "thought": "**Internal thoughts:**\n\nOkay, let\u0027s analyze this question step by step. Anscombe\u0027s work is quite influential in the field of philosophy, particularly in the areas of action theory, intention, and moral philosophy. She\u0027s known for her concept of the \"intention\" in her book \u0027Intention\u0027.\n\nFirst, I\u0027ll consider option D. \"the influence of personal experiences on moral decisions\" - Anscombe\u0027s work is more focused on the concept of intention and action, rather than how personal experiences shape moral decisions. This might not be directly relevant to her claims.\n\nNext, option E. \"the integration of religious beliefs into moral decisions\" - Anscombe was a Catholic and her work was influenced by her faith, but her claims about moral psychology don\u0027t necessarily focus on integrating religious beliefs into moral decisions.\n\nNow, let\u0027s consider option F. \"a thorough study of the subconscious mind\" - Anscombe\u0027s work focuses more on the conscious aspects of moral decision-making, particularly the concept of intention and action. Her work doesn\u0027t delve too much into the subconscious mind.\n\nOption G. \"all of the above\" seems too broad and inclusive, given the specific focus of Anscombe\u0027s work.\n\nOption H. \"an exploration of the concept of \u0027good\u0027 and \u0027evil\u0027\" - while Anscombe touches on these concepts in her work, her primary focus is on the concept of intention and action.\n\nOption I. \"an answer to the mind-body problem\" - Anscombe\u0027s work doesn\u0027t extensively address the mind-body problem.\n\nOption J. \"an explanation of how free will is possible\" - Anscombe does discuss the concept of action and its relationship to free will, but her primary focus is on the concept of intention.\n\nConsidering these options, I think the most relevant aspect of Anscombe\u0027s work in relation to moral psychology is her analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\", rather than the other options.\n\n**Draft Response:**\nBased on Anscombe\u0027s work, an adequate moral psychology should include a detailed analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\".\n\n**Draft Evaluation:**\nThis response seems to be on the right track, but I\u0027m not entirely sure if it\u0027s the most comprehensive or accurate representation of Anscombe\u0027s claims. I might be missing some crucial aspect or overlooking some other relevant connections.\n\nWait, let me consider another option.\n\n**Consideration of Option A:**\nAnscombe\u0027s work does focus on understanding how humans act and make decisions based on their intentions. And the concept of action and intention is closely tied to understanding how people interact with their environment and make moral decisions. This is precisely what a moral psychology should aim to understand: how people act and make decisions based on their intentions.\n\nWith this in mind, I think a more accurate response would include the analysis of these concepts as a central component of moral psychology.\n\n**Revision of Draft Response:**\nBased on Anscombe\u0027s work, an adequate moral psychology would include, of course, a detailed analysis of concepts such as \"action\" and \"intention\".\n\n**Final Evaluation:**\nThis revised response seems more comprehensive and accurate. It directly addresses Anscombe\u0027s key contributions to the field of moral psychology and highlights the importance of understanding action and intention in this context."
}
```

This subset can be loaded as:

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("dvilasuero/meta-llama_Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct_thinking_mmlu-pro_20241017_023744", "default")
```

Or simply as it follows, since there's only one configuration and is named `default`: 

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("dvilasuero/meta-llama_Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct_thinking_mmlu-pro_20241017_023744")
```


</details>




