size_categories:n<1K format:parquet modality:text library:datasets library:pandas library:mlcroissant library:polars library:argilla region:us rlfh argilla human-feedback
---
size_categories: n<1K
tags:
- rlfh
- argilla
- human-feedback
---

# Dataset Card for Megha







This dataset has been created with [Argilla](https://github.com/argilla-io/argilla). As shown in the sections below, this dataset can be loaded into your Argilla server as explained in [Load with Argilla](#load-with-argilla), or used directly with the `datasets` library in [Load with `datasets`](#load-with-datasets).


## Using this dataset with Argilla

To load with Argilla, you'll just need to install Argilla as `pip install argilla --upgrade` and then use the following code:

```python
import argilla as rg

ds = rg.Dataset.from_hub("wyzard-ai/Megha", settings="auto")
```

This will load the settings and records from the dataset repository and push them to you Argilla server for exploration and annotation.

## Using this dataset with `datasets`

To load the records of this dataset with `datasets`, you'll just need to install `datasets` as `pip install datasets --upgrade` and then use the following code:

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("wyzard-ai/Megha")
```

This will only load the records of the dataset, but not the Argilla settings.

## Dataset Structure

This dataset repo contains:

* Dataset records in a format compatible with HuggingFace `datasets`. These records will be loaded automatically when using `rg.Dataset.from_hub` and can be loaded independently using the `datasets` library via `load_dataset`.
* The [annotation guidelines](#annotation-guidelines) that have been used for building and curating the dataset, if they've been defined in Argilla.
* A dataset configuration folder conforming to the Argilla dataset format in `.argilla`.

The dataset is created in Argilla with: **fields**, **questions**, **suggestions**, **metadata**, **vectors**, and **guidelines**.

### Fields

The **fields** are the features or text of a dataset's records. For example, the 'text' column of a text classification dataset of the 'prompt' column of an instruction following dataset.

| Field Name | Title | Type | Required | Markdown |
| ---------- | ----- | ---- | -------- | -------- |
| instruction | User instruction | text | True | True |


### Questions

The **questions** are the questions that will be asked to the annotators. They can be of different types, such as rating, text, label_selection, multi_label_selection, or ranking.

| Question Name | Title | Type | Required | Description | Values/Labels |
| ------------- | ----- | ---- | -------- | ----------- | ------------- |
| relevance_score | How Relevant is the conversation based upon persona | rating | True | N/A | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| accuracy_score | How accurate is the conversation based upon persona | rating | True | If the model answered something unrelated to Argilla SDK | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| clarity_score | How accurate is the conversation based upon persona | rating | True | This field should be used to report any feedback that can be useful | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| actionable_score | How actionable is the conversation based upon persona | rating | True | This field should be used to report any feedback that can be useful | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| engagement_score | How engaging is the conversation based upon persona | rating | True | This field should be used to report any feedback that can be useful | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| completeness_score | is the conversation complete based upon persona | rating | True | This field should be used to report any feedback that can be useful | [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10] |
| feedback | feedback | text | True | What do you think can be improved in the given conversation. How good was the conversation as per you? | N/A |


<!-- check length of metadata properties -->

### Metadata

The **metadata** is a dictionary that can be used to provide additional information about the dataset record.
| Metadata Name | Title | Type | Values | Visible for Annotators |
| ------------- | ----- | ---- | ------ | ---------------------- |
 | conv_id | Conversation ID |  |  -  | True |
 | turn | Conversation Turn |  | 0 - 100 | True |






### Data Instances

An example of a dataset instance in Argilla looks as follows:

```json
{
    "_server_id": "5219171d-bf46-4226-acab-f876e95cd810",
    "fields": {
        "instruction": "user: Do you know if any CRO tools relevant for India?\nassistant: Hi Megha,\n\nAbsolutely!  Given Wyzard\u0027s focus on the Indian market, I can certainly help you find the right CRO tools. To give you the best recommendations, I need a little more information.\n\n*   **What kind of business are you in?** (E.g., E-commerce, SaaS, Fintech)\n*   **What are your specific CRO goals?** (E.g., Increase conversion rates, improve user engagement, reduce bounce rate)\n*   **What\u0027s your budget?** (Approximate range is fine)\n*   **Are there any specific features you\u0027re looking for?** (E.g., A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording)\n\nOnce I have these details, I can tailor my recommendations to your exact needs.  In the meantime, are you familiar with tools like *riyo.ai* or *WhatConverts*?  They offer a range of features relevant to CRO, including customer journey analytics and lead capture.\n\nuser: Ecommerce, Increase Conversion, Low Budget, A/B testing\nassistant: Based on your focus on e-commerce and the need for A/B testing tools within a low budget, I have identified two relevant tools: **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts**. Here\u2019s a comparison of their features and pricing:\n\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison card\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Pricing\", \"json_payload\": [{\"icon\": \"https://gdm-catalog-fmapi-prod.imgix.net/ProductLogo/3d495ffc-a4d5-4177-9eda-d4f9b7f48f64.jpeg\", \"tool_name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"tags\": {\"price\": \"9.99\", \"currency\": \"$\", \"wyzard_discount\": 5, \"wyzard_pricing\": \"9.49\", \"subscription_frequency\": \"MONTHLY\", \"plan_type\": \"Basic\"}, \"features\": [{\"description\": \"A/B Testing\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Heatmaps\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Session Recording\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"availability\": \"true\"}], \"more_info\": \"https://www.riyo.ai/\"}, {\"icon\": \"https://gdm-catalog-fmapi-prod.imgix.net/ProductLogo/5baf147c-4187-4a75-bd07-0ef34da7406a.png\", \"tool_name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"tags\": {\"price\": \"30.00\", \"currency\": \"$\", \"wyzard_discount\": 5, \"wyzard_pricing\": \"28.50\", \"subscription_frequency\": \"MONTHLY\", \"plan_type\": \"Basic\"}, \"features\": [{\"description\": \"A/B Testing\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Lead Capture\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Call Tracking\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"availability\": \"true\"}], \"more_info\": \"https://www.whatconverts.com/\"}]}\n\n### Insights:\n1. **Pricing**: Riyo.ai offers a more budget-friendly option at $9.99/month compared to WhatConverts at $30/month. This makes Riyo.ai particularly suitable for businesses looking to optimize their conversion rates without a significant financial investment.\n\n2. **Features**: Both tools provide essential features for A/B testing and conversion optimization. Riyo.ai includes heatmaps and session recording, which are crucial for understanding user behavior. WhatConverts offers lead capture and call tracking, which can be beneficial for businesses focusing on lead generation.\n\n3. **Business Implications**: Choosing Riyo.ai could provide a cost-effective solution for your e-commerce needs, especially if your primary goal is to conduct A/B testing and improve conversion rates. However, if lead tracking and management are also priorities, WhatConverts may offer additional value.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in exploring these tools further, I recommend booking a demo to see how they can specifically meet your needs!\nfeedback: 1. Popular Names are Missing like - Optimizely etc 2. I would have preferred tabular information 3. again the compare card in the form of rate card is too early in the journey\nuser: Can you give a Pros and Cons analysis of these two tools\nassistant: Absolutely! Let\u0027s dive into the pros and cons of **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts**, followed by a comparison table that highlights their features.\n\n### Pros and Cons Analysis\n\n#### riyo.ai\n**Pros:**\n- **Cost-Effective**: At $9.99/month, it is budget-friendly, making it accessible for small businesses and startups.\n- **Comprehensive Features**: Offers A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, and real-time analytics, which are essential for conversion rate optimization.\n- **User-Friendly**: High ratings for ease of use, making it suitable for users with varying technical expertise.\n- **Real-Time Notifications**: Helps businesses stay updated on user interactions and marketing efforts.\n\n**Cons:**\n- **Limited API Support**: Does not offer an API, which may restrict integration with other tools.\n- **Basic Plan Limitations**: While it has a free trial, the basic plan may lack advanced features needed by larger enterprises.\n\n#### WhatConverts\n**Pros:**\n- **Lead Tracking**: Provides robust lead capture and call tracking features, which are beneficial for businesses focused on lead generation.\n- **Real-Time Reporting**: Offers real-time insights into marketing performance and lead conversion.\n- **Comprehensive Analytics**: Helps businesses understand the effectiveness of their marketing channels.\n\n**Cons:**\n- **Higher Cost**: Starting at $30/month, it may be less appealing for those on a tight budget.\n- **Complexity**: Some users may find the interface less intuitive compared to riyo.ai, especially for beginners.\n\n### Comparison Table\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\nChoosing **riyo.ai** could be a smart move for businesses focused on A/B testing and user behavior analysis without breaking the bank. On the other hand, **WhatConverts** may be more suitable for those prioritizing lead generation and call tracking, despite the higher cost.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in seeing how these tools can specifically benefit your business, I recommend booking a demo to explore their capabilities further!\nuser: Amongst HubSpot and Marketo which one is more suitable for marketing automation?\nassistant: When comparing HubSpot and Marketo for marketing automation, both platforms offer robust features tailored to different business needs. Here\u2019s a concise overview of their strengths and weaknesses:\n\n### Data-Driven Insights\n- **HubSpot** is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive CRM capabilities, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses looking for an all-in-one solution. Its pricing is generally more accessible, especially for startups.\n- **Marketo**, on the other hand, is favored by larger enterprises that require advanced automation features, particularly for account-based marketing and lead nurturing. However, it comes with a higher price tag and a steeper learning curve.\n\n### Comparison Table\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"HubSpot\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"User-Friendly Interface\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Comprehensive CRM\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Nurturing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Email Marketing Automation\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Analytics \u0026 Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Social Media Management\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Integration with Other Tools\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"Marketo\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"User-Friendly Interface\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Comprehensive CRM\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Nurturing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Email Marketing Automation\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Analytics \u0026 Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Social Media Management\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Integration with Other Tools\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\nChoosing **HubSpot** may be advantageous for businesses that prioritize ease of use and cost-effectiveness, especially those just starting with marketing automation. Conversely, **Marketo** could be the better option for organizations that require advanced features and have the budget to support a more complex system.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in exploring how either of these tools can specifically benefit your business, I recommend booking a demo to see their capabilities in action!\nfeedback: I had moved on to Marketing automation question but the context is not updated. The answer is still for the previous question.\nuser: which one should we use?\nassistant: To help you decide between **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts** for your e-commerce marketing automation needs, I\u0027ve created a comparison table that highlights their key features.\n\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\n- **riyo.ai** is an excellent choice if your primary focus is on A/B testing, heatmaps, and session recording, especially with its budget-friendly pricing at $9.99/month. This makes it highly suitable for businesses looking to optimize conversion rates without a significant financial commitment.\n  \n- **WhatConverts**, on the other hand, is more robust in lead capture and call tracking, making it ideal for businesses that prioritize lead generation and management. However, it comes at a higher price point starting at $30/month.\n\nIf you\u2019re looking for a tool that aligns with your specific e-commerce goals, I recommend booking a demo for either tool to see how they can cater to your unique needs!"
    },
    "id": "def4f733-1183-48ef-874d-61544f1d448d",
    "metadata": {
        "conv_id": "d0321eb0-6e3a-48ba-87d7-a0061e2ea85a",
        "turn": 12
    },
    "responses": {},
    "status": "pending",
    "suggestions": {},
    "vectors": {}
}
```

While the same record in HuggingFace `datasets` looks as follows:

```json
{
    "_server_id": "5219171d-bf46-4226-acab-f876e95cd810",
    "accuracy_score.responses": null,
    "accuracy_score.responses.status": null,
    "accuracy_score.responses.users": null,
    "actionable_score.responses": null,
    "actionable_score.responses.status": null,
    "actionable_score.responses.users": null,
    "clarity_score.responses": null,
    "clarity_score.responses.status": null,
    "clarity_score.responses.users": null,
    "completeness_score.responses": null,
    "completeness_score.responses.status": null,
    "completeness_score.responses.users": null,
    "conv_id": "d0321eb0-6e3a-48ba-87d7-a0061e2ea85a",
    "engagement_score.responses": null,
    "engagement_score.responses.status": null,
    "engagement_score.responses.users": null,
    "feedback.responses": null,
    "feedback.responses.status": null,
    "feedback.responses.users": null,
    "id": "def4f733-1183-48ef-874d-61544f1d448d",
    "instruction": "user: Do you know if any CRO tools relevant for India?\nassistant: Hi Megha,\n\nAbsolutely!  Given Wyzard\u0027s focus on the Indian market, I can certainly help you find the right CRO tools. To give you the best recommendations, I need a little more information.\n\n*   **What kind of business are you in?** (E.g., E-commerce, SaaS, Fintech)\n*   **What are your specific CRO goals?** (E.g., Increase conversion rates, improve user engagement, reduce bounce rate)\n*   **What\u0027s your budget?** (Approximate range is fine)\n*   **Are there any specific features you\u0027re looking for?** (E.g., A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording)\n\nOnce I have these details, I can tailor my recommendations to your exact needs.  In the meantime, are you familiar with tools like *riyo.ai* or *WhatConverts*?  They offer a range of features relevant to CRO, including customer journey analytics and lead capture.\n\nuser: Ecommerce, Increase Conversion, Low Budget, A/B testing\nassistant: Based on your focus on e-commerce and the need for A/B testing tools within a low budget, I have identified two relevant tools: **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts**. Here\u2019s a comparison of their features and pricing:\n\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison card\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Pricing\", \"json_payload\": [{\"icon\": \"https://gdm-catalog-fmapi-prod.imgix.net/ProductLogo/3d495ffc-a4d5-4177-9eda-d4f9b7f48f64.jpeg\", \"tool_name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"tags\": {\"price\": \"9.99\", \"currency\": \"$\", \"wyzard_discount\": 5, \"wyzard_pricing\": \"9.49\", \"subscription_frequency\": \"MONTHLY\", \"plan_type\": \"Basic\"}, \"features\": [{\"description\": \"A/B Testing\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Heatmaps\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Session Recording\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"availability\": \"true\"}], \"more_info\": \"https://www.riyo.ai/\"}, {\"icon\": \"https://gdm-catalog-fmapi-prod.imgix.net/ProductLogo/5baf147c-4187-4a75-bd07-0ef34da7406a.png\", \"tool_name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"tags\": {\"price\": \"30.00\", \"currency\": \"$\", \"wyzard_discount\": 5, \"wyzard_pricing\": \"28.50\", \"subscription_frequency\": \"MONTHLY\", \"plan_type\": \"Basic\"}, \"features\": [{\"description\": \"A/B Testing\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Lead Capture\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Call Tracking\", \"availability\": \"true\"}, {\"description\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"availability\": \"true\"}], \"more_info\": \"https://www.whatconverts.com/\"}]}\n\n### Insights:\n1. **Pricing**: Riyo.ai offers a more budget-friendly option at $9.99/month compared to WhatConverts at $30/month. This makes Riyo.ai particularly suitable for businesses looking to optimize their conversion rates without a significant financial investment.\n\n2. **Features**: Both tools provide essential features for A/B testing and conversion optimization. Riyo.ai includes heatmaps and session recording, which are crucial for understanding user behavior. WhatConverts offers lead capture and call tracking, which can be beneficial for businesses focusing on lead generation.\n\n3. **Business Implications**: Choosing Riyo.ai could provide a cost-effective solution for your e-commerce needs, especially if your primary goal is to conduct A/B testing and improve conversion rates. However, if lead tracking and management are also priorities, WhatConverts may offer additional value.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in exploring these tools further, I recommend booking a demo to see how they can specifically meet your needs!\nfeedback: 1. Popular Names are Missing like - Optimizely etc 2. I would have preferred tabular information 3. again the compare card in the form of rate card is too early in the journey\nuser: Can you give a Pros and Cons analysis of these two tools\nassistant: Absolutely! Let\u0027s dive into the pros and cons of **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts**, followed by a comparison table that highlights their features.\n\n### Pros and Cons Analysis\n\n#### riyo.ai\n**Pros:**\n- **Cost-Effective**: At $9.99/month, it is budget-friendly, making it accessible for small businesses and startups.\n- **Comprehensive Features**: Offers A/B testing, heatmaps, session recording, and real-time analytics, which are essential for conversion rate optimization.\n- **User-Friendly**: High ratings for ease of use, making it suitable for users with varying technical expertise.\n- **Real-Time Notifications**: Helps businesses stay updated on user interactions and marketing efforts.\n\n**Cons:**\n- **Limited API Support**: Does not offer an API, which may restrict integration with other tools.\n- **Basic Plan Limitations**: While it has a free trial, the basic plan may lack advanced features needed by larger enterprises.\n\n#### WhatConverts\n**Pros:**\n- **Lead Tracking**: Provides robust lead capture and call tracking features, which are beneficial for businesses focused on lead generation.\n- **Real-Time Reporting**: Offers real-time insights into marketing performance and lead conversion.\n- **Comprehensive Analytics**: Helps businesses understand the effectiveness of their marketing channels.\n\n**Cons:**\n- **Higher Cost**: Starting at $30/month, it may be less appealing for those on a tight budget.\n- **Complexity**: Some users may find the interface less intuitive compared to riyo.ai, especially for beginners.\n\n### Comparison Table\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\nChoosing **riyo.ai** could be a smart move for businesses focused on A/B testing and user behavior analysis without breaking the bank. On the other hand, **WhatConverts** may be more suitable for those prioritizing lead generation and call tracking, despite the higher cost.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in seeing how these tools can specifically benefit your business, I recommend booking a demo to explore their capabilities further!\nuser: Amongst HubSpot and Marketo which one is more suitable for marketing automation?\nassistant: When comparing HubSpot and Marketo for marketing automation, both platforms offer robust features tailored to different business needs. Here\u2019s a concise overview of their strengths and weaknesses:\n\n### Data-Driven Insights\n- **HubSpot** is known for its user-friendly interface and comprehensive CRM capabilities, making it suitable for small to medium-sized businesses looking for an all-in-one solution. Its pricing is generally more accessible, especially for startups.\n- **Marketo**, on the other hand, is favored by larger enterprises that require advanced automation features, particularly for account-based marketing and lead nurturing. However, it comes with a higher price tag and a steeper learning curve.\n\n### Comparison Table\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"HubSpot\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"User-Friendly Interface\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Comprehensive CRM\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Nurturing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Email Marketing Automation\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Analytics \u0026 Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Social Media Management\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Integration with Other Tools\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"Marketo\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"User-Friendly Interface\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Comprehensive CRM\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Nurturing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Email Marketing Automation\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Analytics \u0026 Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Social Media Management\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Integration with Other Tools\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\nChoosing **HubSpot** may be advantageous for businesses that prioritize ease of use and cost-effectiveness, especially those just starting with marketing automation. Conversely, **Marketo** could be the better option for organizations that require advanced features and have the budget to support a more complex system.\n\nIf you\u0027re interested in exploring how either of these tools can specifically benefit your business, I recommend booking a demo to see their capabilities in action!\nfeedback: I had moved on to Marketing automation question but the context is not updated. The answer is still for the previous question.\nuser: which one should we use?\nassistant: To help you decide between **riyo.ai** and **WhatConverts** for your e-commerce marketing automation needs, I\u0027ve created a comparison table that highlights their key features.\n\nnull{\"graph_type\": \"comparison table\", \"x_label\": \"Tools\", \"y_label\": \"Features\", \"json_payload\": [{\"name\": \"riyo.ai\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}]}, {\"name\": \"WhatConverts\", \"info\": [{\"feature\": \"A/B Testing\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Heatmaps\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Session Recording\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Analytics\", \"value\": false, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Lead Capture\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Call Tracking\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}, {\"feature\": \"Real-Time Reporting\", \"value\": true, \"subFeatures\": []}]}]}\n\n### Business Implications\n- **riyo.ai** is an excellent choice if your primary focus is on A/B testing, heatmaps, and session recording, especially with its budget-friendly pricing at $9.99/month. This makes it highly suitable for businesses looking to optimize conversion rates without a significant financial commitment.\n  \n- **WhatConverts**, on the other hand, is more robust in lead capture and call tracking, making it ideal for businesses that prioritize lead generation and management. However, it comes at a higher price point starting at $30/month.\n\nIf you\u2019re looking for a tool that aligns with your specific e-commerce goals, I recommend booking a demo for either tool to see how they can cater to your unique needs!",
    "relevance_score.responses": null,
    "relevance_score.responses.status": null,
    "relevance_score.responses.users": null,
    "status": "pending",
    "turn": 12
}
```


### Data Splits

The dataset contains a single split, which is `train`.

## Dataset Creation

### Curation Rationale

[More Information Needed]

### Source Data

#### Initial Data Collection and Normalization

[More Information Needed]

#### Who are the source language producers?

[More Information Needed]

### Annotations

#### Annotation guidelines

Review the user interactions with the chatbot.

#### Annotation process

[More Information Needed]

#### Who are the annotators?

[More Information Needed]

### Personal and Sensitive Information

[More Information Needed]

## Considerations for Using the Data

### Social Impact of Dataset

[More Information Needed]

### Discussion of Biases

[More Information Needed]

### Other Known Limitations

[More Information Needed]

## Additional Information

### Dataset Curators

[More Information Needed]

### Licensing Information

[More Information Needed]

### Citation Information

[More Information Needed]

### Contributions

[More Information Needed]