size_categories:n<1K format:parquet modality:tabular modality:text library:datasets library:pandas library:mlcroissant library:polars library:distilabel region:us synthetic distilabel rlaif
---
size_categories: n<1K
dataset_info:
  features:
  - name: text
    dtype: string
  - name: id
    dtype: string
  - name: dump
    dtype: string
  - name: url
    dtype: string
  - name: file_path
    dtype: string
  - name: language
    dtype: string
  - name: language_score
    dtype: float64
  - name: token_count
    dtype: int64
  - name: score
    dtype: float64
  - name: int_score
    dtype: int64
  - name: system_prompt
    dtype: string
  - name: conversation
    list:
    - name: content
      dtype: string
    - name: role
      dtype: string
  - name: gen_conv_model_name
    dtype: string
  - name: generations
    sequence: string
  - name: distilabel_metadata
    struct:
    - name: raw_output_chat_generation_2
      dtype: string
  - name: generations_model_names
    sequence: string
  splits:
  - name: train
    num_bytes: 3085941
    num_examples: 100
  download_size: 1176487
  dataset_size: 3085941
configs:
- config_name: default
  data_files:
  - split: train
    path: data/train-*
tags:
- synthetic
- distilabel
- rlaif
---

<p align="left">
  <a href="https://github.com/argilla-io/distilabel">
    <img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/argilla-io/distilabel/main/docs/assets/distilabel-badge-light.png" alt="Built with Distilabel" width="200" height="32"/>
  </a>
</p>

# Dataset Card for fine-preferences-magpie-v6-tasky-7-5

This dataset has been created with [distilabel](https://distilabel.argilla.io/).



## Dataset Summary

This dataset contains a `pipeline.yaml` which can be used to reproduce the pipeline that generated it in distilabel using the `distilabel` CLI:

```console
distilabel pipeline run --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/distilabel-internal-testing/fine-preferences-magpie-v6-tasky-7-5/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
```

or explore the configuration:

```console
distilabel pipeline info --config "https://huggingface.co/datasets/distilabel-internal-testing/fine-preferences-magpie-v6-tasky-7-5/raw/main/pipeline.yaml"
```

## Dataset structure

The examples have the following structure per configuration:


<details><summary> Configuration: default </summary><hr>

```json
{
    "conversation": [
        {
            "content": "Imagine a galaxy where a series of Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) have occurred, creating multiple kpc-size shells and holes in the interstellar medium (ISM). How would the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution be affected, and what would be the implications for star formation and the overall ecosystem of the galaxy?",
            "role": "user"
        },
        {
            "content": "The occurrence of multiple GRBs in a galaxy would have a profound impact on its structure and evolution. The creation of kpc-size shells and holes in the ISM would significantly alter the galaxy\u0027s morphology and dynamics. Here are some potential effects:\n\n1. **Galaxy-scale outflows**: The collective energy released by the GRBs would drive powerful outflows of gas from the galaxy, potentially quenching star formation in certain regions. These outflows could also affect the galaxy\u0027s chemical evolution, as metal-enriched gas is expelled into the intergalactic medium.\n2. **ISM disruption and fragmentation**: The formation of shells and holes would disrupt the ISM\u0027s density and velocity structure, leading to the fragmentation of molecular clouds and the suppression of star formation in affected regions. This could result in a more porous and turbulent ISM, with implications for the galaxy\u0027s overall star formation rate.\n3. **Star formation suppression and triggering**: The GRB-induced outflows and ISM disruption could suppress star formation in certain regions, while the compression of gas in the shells and holes might trigger the formation of new stars. This could lead to a complex, spatially-dependent star formation history, with bursts of star formation in certain regions and suppression in others.\n4. **Galaxy morphology and stability**: The creation of large-scale holes and shells could alter the galaxy\u0027s rotation curve, potentially affecting its stability and morphology. This might lead to the formation of ring-like structures or even the triggering of galaxy-scale instabilities, such as bars or spiral arms.\n5. **Feedback mechanisms**: The GRBs would provide a powerful feedback mechanism, regulating the galaxy\u0027s growth and evolution by controlling the amount of gas available for star formation. This feedback could be particularly important in low-mass galaxies, where the energy released by GRBs could have a more significant impact on the galaxy\u0027s evolution.\n6. **Cosmic ray and high-energy particle propagation**: The GRBs would accelerate cosmic rays and high-energy particles, which could propagate through the galaxy, affecting the ISM and potentially influencing the formation of stars and planets.\n7. **Galaxy ecosystem implications**: The altered galaxy structure and evolution would have significant implications for the ecosystem of the galaxy. The changed radiation field, cosmic ray flux, and gas properties could affect the formation and evolution of planetary systems, potentially influencing the emergence of life.\n\nTo better understand these implications, it would be essential to simulate the effects of multiple GRBs on a galaxy\u0027s evolution using hydrodynamic and radiative transfer models. These simulations could provide valuable insights",
            "role": "assistant"
        },
        {
            "content": "How would the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution be affected if the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution?",
            "role": "user"
        },
        {
            "content": "If the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution would be affected in a more organized and coherent manner. Here are some potential implications:\n\n**Spiral pattern:**\n\n1. **Spiral arm formation and maintenance**: The GRBs could help maintain and shape the galaxy\u0027s spiral arms by creating regions of compressed gas, triggering star formation, and regulating the flow of gas and stars along the arms.\n2. **Star formation waves**: The spiral pattern of GRBs could create a wave-like propagation of star formation, with bursts of star formation occurring in a sequential manner along the arms. This could lead to a more organized and coherent star formation history.\n3. **Gas dynamics and inflows**: The GRBs would create a spiral pattern of outflows and inflows, with gas being expelled from the galaxy in certain regions and accreting onto the galaxy in others. This could lead to a more efficient regulation of gas flows and a more organized galaxy-scale circulation.\n4. **Galaxy-scale resonances**: The spiral pattern of GRBs could excite galaxy-scale resonances, leading to the formation of density waves and spiral arms. This could result in a more stable and organized galaxy structure.\n\n**Ring-like distribution:**\n\n1. **Ring galaxy formation**: The GRBs could create a ring-like structure in the galaxy, with the explosions occurring in a circular pattern. This could lead to the formation of a ring galaxy, with a central void and a ring of star-forming regions.\n2. **Star formation and quenching**: The ring-like distribution of GRBs could create a pattern of star formation and quenching, with bursts of star formation occurring in the ring and quenching in the central void.\n3. **Gas dynamics and circulation**: The GRBs would create a ring-like pattern of outflows and inflows, with gas being expelled from the galaxy in certain regions and accreting onto the galaxy in others. This could lead to a more efficient regulation of gas flows and a more organized galaxy-scale circulation.\n4. **Galaxy-scale stability**: The ring-like distribution of GRBs could provide a stabilizing influence on the galaxy, with the explosions helping to maintain the galaxy\u0027s axisymmetric structure and preventing the formation of bars or other instabilities.\n\nIn both cases, the specific pattern of GRBs would introduce a new level of organization and coherence to the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution. The explosions would create a complex interplay between gas dynamics",
            "role": "assistant"
        },
        {
            "content": "How would the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution be affected if the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, and if the GRBs were to occur in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction?",
            "role": "user"
        }
    ],
    "distilabel_metadata": {
        "raw_output_chat_generation_2": "If the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, and in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction, the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution would be affected in a more complex and nuanced manner. Here are some potential implications:\n\n**Spiral pattern with a specific sequence:**\n\n1. **Spiral arm formation and co-rotation**: If the GRBs occur in a clockwise direction, they would create a spiral pattern that co-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This would lead to a more organized and coherent spiral arm structure, with star formation and gas flows aligned with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n2. **Counter-rotation and galaxy-scale instabilities**: If the GRBs occur in a counterclockwise direction, they would create a spiral pattern that counter-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This could lead to the formation of galaxy-scale instabilities, such as bars or oval distortions, as the counter-rotating spiral arms interact with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n3. **Star formation waves and galaxy-scale oscillations**: The specific sequence of GRBs would create a wave-like propagation of star formation, with bursts of star formation occurring in a sequential manner along the spiral arms. This could lead to galaxy-scale oscillations, with the galaxy\u0027s structure and star formation rate oscillating in response to the sequence of GRBs.\n4. **Galaxy-scale resonances and pattern speed**: The specific sequence of GRBs would excite galaxy-scale resonances, leading to the formation of density waves and spiral arms. The pattern speed of the spiral arms would be influenced by the sequence of GRBs, with implications for the galaxy\u0027s overall structure and evolution.\n\n**Ring-like distribution with a specific sequence:**\n\n1. **Ring galaxy formation and rotation**: If the GRBs occur in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise direction, they would create a ring-like structure that rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This would lead to a more organized and coherent ring galaxy structure, with star formation and gas flows aligned with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n2. **Ring galaxy instabilities and fragmentation**: If the GRBs occur in a counterclockwise direction, they would create a ring-like structure that counter-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This could lead to the formation of instabilities and fragmentation in the ring, with implications for the galaxy\u0027s overall structure and evolution.\n3. **Star formation and quenching patterns**: The specific sequence of"
    },
    "dump": "CC-MAIN-2013-20",
    "file_path": "s3://commoncrawl/crawl-data/CC-MAIN-2013-20/segments/1368696381249/warc/CC-MAIN-20130516092621-00000-ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal.warc.gz",
    "gen_conv_model_name": "meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct",
    "generations": [
        " If the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, and in a specific sequence, such as clockwise or counterclockwise, the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution would be affected in a more predictable and ordered manner. Here are some potential implications:\n\n**Spiral pattern with sequence:**\n\n1. **Sequential star formation and gas flows**: The GRBs occurring in a clockwise or counterclockwise sequence would create a spiral pattern of star formation and gas flows, with bursts of star formation and outflows occurring in a sequential and organized manner along the arms. This could lead to a more predictable and ordered star formation history and gas dynamics.\n2. **Galaxy-scale rotation**: The clockwise or counterclockwise sequence of GRBs could help maintain and synchronize the galaxy\u0027s overall rotation, with the explosions helping to regulate the flow of gas and stars along the arms.\n3. **Propagation of waves**: The sequential occurrence of GRBs could lead to the propagation of waves through the galaxy, with the explosions triggering a series of shock waves that would travel along the arms, affecting the gas dynamics and star formation processes.\n\n**Ring-like distribution with sequence:**\n\n1. **Ordered star formation and quenching**: The GRBs occurring in a clockwise or counterclockwise sequence would create a ring-like pattern of star formation and quenching, with bursts of star formation and quenching occurring in a predictable and ordered manner along the ring.\n2. **Gas dynamics and circulation**: The sequential occurrence of GRBs would create a ring-like pattern of outflows and inflows, with gas being expelled from the galaxy in certain regions and accreting onto the galaxy in others. This could lead to a more organized and predictable regulation of gas flows and a more ordered galaxy-scale circulation.\n3. **Galaxy-scale symmetry**: The clockwise or counterclockwise sequence of GRBs could provide a symmetrical influence on the galaxy, with the explosions helping to maintain the galaxy\u0027s axisymmetric structure and preventing the formation of bars or other instabilities.\n\nIn both cases, the specific pattern and sequence of GRBs would introduce a new level of predictability and order to the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution. The explos",
        "If the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, and in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction, the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution would be affected in a more coordinated and sequential manner. Here are some potential implications:\n\n1. **Galaxy-scale rotation and dynamics**: The specific sequence of GRBs would introduce a new level of organization and coherence to the galaxy\u0027s rotational dynamics, with the explosions helping to maintain the galaxy\u0027s rotation curve and potentially affecting the formation of bars or spiral arms.\n2. **Gas dynamics and circulation**: The specific pattern and sequence of GRBs would create a more organized and sequential pattern of outflows and inflows, with gas being expelled from the galaxy in a specific direction and accreting onto the galaxy in a coordinated manner. This could lead to a more efficient regulation of gas flows and a more organized galaxy-scale circulation.\n3. **Star formation and quenching**: The specific pattern and sequence of GRBs would create a more organized and sequential pattern of star formation and quenching, with bursts of star formation occurring in a specific region of the galaxy and quenching occurring in a coordinated manner. This could lead to a more coherent star formation history and a more organized galaxy structure.\n4. **Galaxy-scale stability**: The specific pattern and sequence of GRBs could provide a stabilizing influence on the galaxy, with the explosions helping to maintain the galaxy\u0027s axisymmetric structure and preventing the formation of bars or other instabilities.\n5. **Cosmic ray and high-energy particle propagation**: The specific pattern and sequence of GRBs would affect the propagation of cosmic rays and high-energy particles through the galaxy, potentially influencing the formation and evolution of planetary systems and the emergence of life.\n\nTo better understand these implications, it would be essential to simulate the effects of multiple GRBs occurring in specific patterns and sequences on a galaxy\u0027s evolution using hydrodynamic and radiative transfer models. These simulations could provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between GRBs, gas dynamics, and galaxy-scale evolution. Additionally, observational studies of galaxies with known GRB distributions could help constrain the models and provide further insights into the role of GRBs in",
        "If the GRBs were to occur in a specific pattern, such as a spiral or ring-like distribution, and in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction, the galaxy\u0027s structure and evolution would be affected in a more complex and nuanced manner. Here are some potential implications:\n\n**Spiral pattern with a specific sequence:**\n\n1. **Spiral arm formation and co-rotation**: If the GRBs occur in a clockwise direction, they would create a spiral pattern that co-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This would lead to a more organized and coherent spiral arm structure, with star formation and gas flows aligned with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n2. **Counter-rotation and galaxy-scale instabilities**: If the GRBs occur in a counterclockwise direction, they would create a spiral pattern that counter-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This could lead to the formation of galaxy-scale instabilities, such as bars or oval distortions, as the counter-rotating spiral arms interact with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n3. **Star formation waves and galaxy-scale oscillations**: The specific sequence of GRBs would create a wave-like propagation of star formation, with bursts of star formation occurring in a sequential manner along the spiral arms. This could lead to galaxy-scale oscillations, with the galaxy\u0027s structure and star formation rate oscillating in response to the sequence of GRBs.\n4. **Galaxy-scale resonances and pattern speed**: The specific sequence of GRBs would excite galaxy-scale resonances, leading to the formation of density waves and spiral arms. The pattern speed of the spiral arms would be influenced by the sequence of GRBs, with implications for the galaxy\u0027s overall structure and evolution.\n\n**Ring-like distribution with a specific sequence:**\n\n1. **Ring galaxy formation and rotation**: If the GRBs occur in a specific sequence, such as in a clockwise direction, they would create a ring-like structure that rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This would lead to a more organized and coherent ring galaxy structure, with star formation and gas flows aligned with the galaxy\u0027s rotation.\n2. **Ring galaxy instabilities and fragmentation**: If the GRBs occur in a counterclockwise direction, they would create a ring-like structure that counter-rotates with the galaxy\u0027s rotation. This could lead to the formation of instabilities and fragmentation in the ring, with implications for the galaxy\u0027s overall structure and evolution.\n3. **Star formation and quenching patterns**: The specific sequence of"
    ],
    "generations_model_names": [
        "mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1",
        "NousResearch/Nous-Hermes-2-Mixtral-8x7B-DPO",
        "meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-70B-Instruct"
    ],
    "id": "\u003curn:uuid:e2300ad5-01dd-4e80-92b3-7ec88785cc9d\u003e",
    "int_score": 3,
    "language": "en",
    "language_score": 0.9126408100128174,
    "score": 2.765625,
    "system_prompt": "\nYou\u0027re a helpful AI assistant that responds to complex user tasks based on a document\u0027s content, without explicitly mentioning the document. \nFollow these guidelines:\n\n## 1. Preparation\n\n- Thoroughly analyze the document\u0027s main topics, key points, themes, and any data or methodologies presented.\n- The interaction will consist of complex user tasks, follow-up questions, and detailed AI assistant responses.\n\n## 2. Interaction Structure and Roles\n\nThis interaction involves two roles: the User and the AI Assistant. The conversation will follow this structure:\n\n1. User: Provides complex tasks and follow-up questions.\n   First message format: \u003ctask_description\u003e\n   Subsequent messages:\n   a) \u003cquestion_or_comment\u003e\n   b) \u003cnew_task_description\u003e\n\n2. AI Assistant: Responds to tasks and follow-up questions using information from the document.\n\nThe conversation will follow this pattern:\n[TASK] -\u003e AI Response -\u003e [FOLLOW-UP] -\u003e AI Response -\u003e [FOLLOW-UP] -\u003e AI Response -\u003e [NEXT TASK] -\u003e AI Response -\u003e (repeat)\n\nUser Guidelines:\n- The first message MUST be a complex task related to the document\u0027s content.\n- For [FOLLOW-UP], ask for clarification, request examples, challenge the AI\u0027s response, or propose alternatives.\n- Use [NEXT TASK] to introduce a new complex task exploring a different aspect of the document.\n\nAI Assistant Guidelines:\n- Provide detailed responses to tasks and thoughtful engagement with follow-ups.\n- Never mention or reference the source document directly.\n\n## 3. User Task Characteristics\n\nComplex tasks should:\n\n- Challenge various cognitive skills, including but not limited to:\n  * Analysis and critical thinking\n  * Synthesis of ideas\n  * Evaluation and assessment\n  * Creative problem-solving\n  * Application of concepts to new contexts\n  * Predictive reasoning\n  * Comparative analysis\n\n- Require multi-step thinking or consideration of multiple factors\n- Encourage exploration of different perspectives or stakeholders\n- Prompt the application of document content to real-world scenarios\n- Involve interdisciplinary connections where applicable\n- Stimulate innovative thinking and novel applications of ideas\n- Address potential challenges, limitations, or ethical considerations\n- Encourage the development of actionable strategies or solutions\n\nVary the scope and nature of tasks, alternating between broad, overarching challenges and more focused, specific problems. Adapt the complexity and technical depth of tasks to match the document\u0027s content and intended audience.\n\nAvoid simple, fact-based questions or tasks that can be completed with surface-level understanding. Instead, craft tasks that necessitate a thorough comprehension and creative application of the document\u0027s key concepts, methodologies, or findings.\n\n### Enhanced Task Variety\n\nTo ensure a wide variety of complex opening tasks, consider the following approaches:\n\n1. Hypothetical Scenarios: \"Imagine a world where [key concept from the document] is reversed. How would this impact [related systems or processes]?\"\n2. Comparative Analysis: \"Contrast the approach described in the document with [alternative approach]. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each?\"\n3. Ethical Dilemmas: \"Present an ethical dilemma that arises from implementing the ideas in the document. How would you navigate this challenge?\"\n4. Interdisciplinary Integration: \"Propose a way to integrate the document\u0027s core concepts with [unrelated field]. What novel applications could emerge?\"\n5. Historical Context: \"Trace the evolution of [key idea] discussed in the document. How might it continue to evolve in the next decade?\"\n6. Stakeholder Perspectives: \"Analyze the document\u0027s main argument from the perspective of [specific stakeholder group]. What concerns or opportunities would they identify?\"\n7. Systems Thinking: \"Map out the systemic implications of implementing the document\u0027s central proposal. Include both intended and potential unintended consequences.\"\n8. Future Forecasting: \"Based on the trends discussed in the document, predict three possible scenarios for [related area] in 20 years. What factors would influence each outcome?\"\n9. Resource Allocation: \"Outline a strategy to implement the document\u0027s key recommendations with limited resources. What trade-offs would you make and why?\"\n10. Cross-Cultural Application: \"Evaluate how the document\u0027s findings might be applied in [specific cultural context]. What adaptations would be necessary?\"\n11. Risk Assessment: \"Conduct a comprehensive risk analysis of the primary method or theory presented in the document. How could these risks be mitigated?\"\n12. Innovation Challenge: \"Propose three unconventional ways to apply the document\u0027s central concept in [unrelated industry]. How might these innovations disrupt the status quo?\"\n13. Policy Formulation: \"Draft a policy framework based on the document\u0027s insights. Address potential opposition and implementation challenges.\"\n14. Competitive Analysis: \"Position the document\u0027s main idea as a market offering. How would it compete against existing solutions, and what would be its unique value proposition?\"\n15. Paradigm Shift: \"Argue for or against the notion that the document\u0027s central thesis represents a paradigm shift in its field. Support your position with evidence and reasoning.\"\n16. Summarization and Synthesis: \"Distill the document\u0027s key arguments and findings into a concise executive summary. Highlight the most impactful insights and their potential applications.\"\n17. Fallacy Identification: \"Critically examine the document\u0027s argumentation. Identify any logical fallacies or weak points in the reasoning, and suggest how these could be addressed to strengthen the overall argument.\"\n18. Methodological Critique: \"Evaluate the methodology used in the document. What are its strengths and limitations? Propose an alternative methodology that could address any weaknesses you\u0027ve identified.\"\n19. Trend Analysis: \"Based on the document\u0027s content, identify emerging trends in the field. How might these trends intersect with developments in technology, society, or economics?\"\n20. Counterfactual Thinking: \"Consider a key assumption or finding in the document. How would the conclusions change if this assumption were proven false or if an opposite finding were true?\"\n21. Stakeholder Impact Matrix: \"Create a matrix analyzing how the document\u0027s main proposals would impact different stakeholders. Include both direct and indirect effects, short-term and long-term consequences.\"\n22. Cross-Disciplinary Application: \"Translate the document\u0027s core concepts into actionable insights for three unrelated fields. How might these ideas spark innovation in those areas?\"\n23. Scenario Planning: \"Develop three detailed scenarios depicting possible futures based on the document\u0027s insights. Include best-case, worst-case, and most likely outcomes.\"\n24. Gap Analysis: \"Identify areas or questions that the document doesn\u0027t address but are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the topic. How would you go about filling these knowledge gaps?\"\n25. Analogical Reasoning: \"Draw an analogy between the document\u0027s central concept and a natural phenomenon or historical event. Use this analogy to gain new insights into the original idea.\"\n26. Reverse Engineering: \"Working backwards from the document\u0027s conclusions, reconstruct the logical steps and evidence that led to these findings. Identify any assumptions or leaps in reasoning in this process.\"\n27. Ethical Framework Development: \"Based on the document\u0027s content, construct an ethical framework for decision-making in this field. What principles should guide practitioners, and how do these relate to broader ethical theories?\"\n28. Meta-Analysis Proposal: \"Outline a meta-analysis study that would build upon and extend the findings presented in the document. What additional data sources or methodologies would you include?\"\n29. Multilevel Perspective: \"Analyze the document\u0027s main ideas from micro, meso, and macro levels. How do the implications differ at individual, organizational, and societal scales?\"\n30. Narrative Construction: \"Craft a compelling narrative that illustrates the real-world impact of the document\u0027s key findings. Use storytelling techniques to make the concepts accessible to a non-expert audience.\"\n\nDO NOT GENERATE TASKS LIKE: \"Design a system...\", \"Design a comprehensive...\", etc.\n\n## 4. AI Assistant Characteristics\n\n- Provide comprehensive, well-structured responses that directly address all aspects of the complex task.\n- Draw connections between different parts of the document to create a cohesive analysis or solution.\n- Offer concrete examples, potential scenarios, or case studies to illustrate your points when appropriate.\n- Be prepared to break down complex tasks into manageable steps or components in your response.\n\n## 5. Engagement\n\n- Maintain a professional and analytical tone throughout the interaction.\n- Encourage critical thinking by highlighting potential challenges or alternative viewpoints in your responses.\n- Conclude complex tasks with a summary of key points or next steps when appropriate.\n\n## 6. General Guidelines\n\n- Ensure the interaction demonstrates a high level of expertise and in-depth understanding of the document\u0027s content.\n- The AI\u0027s knowledge should reflect the document\u0027s scope but also show the ability to apply this information to novel situations or problems.\n- Adapt the level of detail and technical language to match the complexity of the user\u0027s task.\n\nRemember: Never mention or directly reference the source document in the generated interaction. The AI assistant should present information and analysis as if it\u0027s part of its general knowledge base and problem-solving capabilities.\n\n## Document\n\nPrevious abstract Next abstract\nSession 40 - The Interstellar Medium.\nDisplay session, Tuesday, June 09\nGamma Ray Burst (GRB) explosions can make kpc-size shells and holes in the interstellar media (ISM) of spiral galaxies if much of the energy heats the local gas to above 10^7 K. Disk blowout is probably the major cause for energy loss in this case, but the momentum acquired during the pressurized expansion phase can be large enough that the bubble still snowplows to a kpc diameter. This differs from the standard model for the origin of such shells by multiple supernovae, which may have problems with radiative cooling, evaporative losses, and disk blow-out. Evidence for giant shells with energies of \\sim10^53 ergs are summarized. Some contain no obvious central star clusters and may be GRB remnants, although sufficiently old clusters would be hard to detect. The expected frequency of GRBs in normal galaxies can account for the number of such shells.\nProgram listing for Tuesday\n",
    "text": "Previous abstract Next abstract\nSession 40 - The Interstellar Medium.\nDisplay session, Tuesday, June 09\nGamma Ray Burst (GRB) explosions can make kpc-size shells and holes in the interstellar media (ISM) of spiral galaxies if much of the energy heats the local gas to above 10^7 K. Disk blowout is probably the major cause for energy loss in this case, but the momentum acquired during the pressurized expansion phase can be large enough that the bubble still snowplows to a kpc diameter. This differs from the standard model for the origin of such shells by multiple supernovae, which may have problems with radiative cooling, evaporative losses, and disk blow-out. Evidence for giant shells with energies of \\sim10^53 ergs are summarized. Some contain no obvious central star clusters and may be GRB remnants, although sufficiently old clusters would be hard to detect. The expected frequency of GRBs in normal galaxies can account for the number of such shells.\nProgram listing for Tuesday",
    "token_count": 208,
    "url": "http://aas.org/archives/BAAS/v30n2/aas192/abs/S040015.html"
}
```

This subset can be loaded as:

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("distilabel-internal-testing/fine-preferences-magpie-v6-tasky-7-5", "default")
```

Or simply as it follows, since there's only one configuration and is named `default`: 

```python
from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("distilabel-internal-testing/fine-preferences-magpie-v6-tasky-7-5")
```


</details>
