Clearly, the evidence that I require - that the climate models have been validated - is not available, which is as I have said all along. In short, there is no evidence that these models are producing anything other than numerical noise. If such evidence exists, post it, or a link to it, or cite a paper that shows it. Put up or shut up - and you will notice that Eli, who, in other forums incites people to violence and relies on ad hom attacks, has dropped this issue like a hot potatoe. Why? Because he knows I am speaking the truth and that no such evidence exists. In fact, the only published research on the convergence issue for the 0D N-S equations (Ye et al) is that no such convergence exists. The evidence for numerical stability of the models is also negative - most require an "island" at the north pole or they simply cannot perform their calculations - this is unphysical and the "fix" for such things as negative mass is to add to the code and "constrain" values to what's physically possible. Further, you will never see such model output in absolute temperatures, only as "anomolies". Why? Because they are off by up to 00C or more in absolute terms!