 Hide Permalink Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 Yoann Dubreuil if we could try it on some server, it would be worth it as cold is exactly the case we want ot optimise for right now. Show Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 Yoann Dubreuil if we could try it on some server, it would be worth it as cold is exactly the case we want ot optimise for right now. Hide Permalink Tom FENNELLY added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 - edited how do we know without trying to combine the react stuff as mentioned here We have tried it before (see below). I suppose I'm just not too gone on fundamental build changes for what really seems to be an edge edge case. How many production setups run Jenkins on one side of the world and expect cold loading to be fast on a browser on the other side of the world? That's not a realistic OOTB use case imo, unless someone can show me otherwise. is it not possible? It is possible. We had it that way before and moved to splitting it out to see if async loading would help and it did seem to at the time. Show Tom FENNELLY added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 - edited how do we know without trying to combine the react stuff as mentioned here We have tried it before (see below). I suppose I'm just not too gone on fundamental build changes for what really seems to be an edge edge case. How many production setups run Jenkins on one side of the world and expect cold loading to be fast on a browser on the other side of the world? That's not a realistic OOTB use case imo, unless someone can show me otherwise. is it not possible? It is possible. We had it that way before and moved to splitting it out to see if async loading would help and it did seem to at the time. Hide Permalink Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 Tom FENNELLY ack, yes I recall. Well I think I might close this. Do you have other things you would like to try that could help trim things in future? Show Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 Tom FENNELLY ack, yes I recall. Well I think I might close this. Do you have other things you would like to try that could help trim things in future? Hide Permalink Tom FENNELLY added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 There was some work I was doing on bundling some time ago (that we parked) around making them "more accurate" in terms of what should be in them. I know that sounds vague (and I can explain more if you don't find it too boring - bundling is not all that exciting), but the upshot in terms of bundle sizes is expected to be varied in that some bundles will get slimmer (removal of modules that should not be in there) and some may get a bit heavier (addition of some modules that should be in there). All post 0.0 as it's not biting us atm. Show Tom FENNELLY added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 There was some work I was doing on bundling some time ago (that we parked) around making them "more accurate" in terms of what should be in them. I know that sounds vague (and I can explain more if you don't find it too boring - bundling is not all that exciting), but the upshot in terms of bundle sizes is expected to be varied in that some bundles will get slimmer (removal of modules that should not be in there) and some may get a bit heavier (addition of some modules that should be in there). All post 0.0 as it's not biting us atm. Hide Permalink Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 SGTM Show Michael Neale added a comment - 0000-00-00 00:00 SGTM 