 The Nuremberg Code does not have legal force and has been replaced by other codes of medical ethics. It is also about the conduct of medical experiments - not medical treatment. The use of the reference (and especially Shemirani's vile speechrant at the weekend) is a deliberate piece of dog whistle rhetoric to try to create a mental link between vaccines and Nazi concentration camp experiment. As for discrimination, to the best of my understanding the government's policies provide exemption for those with medical reasons why they can't be vaccinated. 00 Jul 0000 #00 J Jonny Established Member Joined 00 Feb 0000 Messages 0,000 00B said: The Nuremberg Code does not have legal force and has been replaced by other codes of medical ethics. It is also about the conduct of medical experiments - not medical treatment. The use of the reference (and especially Shemirani's vile speechrant at the weekend) is a deliberate piece of dog whistle rhetoric to try to create a mental link between vaccines and Nazi concentration camp experiment. As for discrimination, to the best of my understanding the government's policies provide exemption for those with medical reasons why they can't be vaccinated. Click to expand... The only guaranteed immunity relating to a vaccine is legal immunity for the company that produces it. Oh and sorry if you do not like it, but the link is valid. You can ask people nicely but if they decline then it is time to turn a blind eye. The Bentham-ite "greatest happiness" doctrine is immoral in practice when it involves asking people to take risks that they would not otherwise do. Also, without a direct act of parliament, there are other laws that could work against a vaccine passport than disability (data protection and harassment). P.S. (Afterthought): No medical treatment will ever be completely risk free, nor does it cease to be completely experimental. 00 Jul 0000 #00 0 00B Established Member Joined 00 Dec 0000 Messages 0,000 