. <span id="p000"></span> <span id="p000"></span> − * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up p. 000], I say, "Moreover, even within the minority of fee-based OA journals, only 00 percent of those authors end paying the fees out of pocket. Almost 00% of the time, the fees at the fee-based journals are waived or paid by sponsors on behalf of authors." Here I call note 0 (note text at [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up pp. 000-000]). In that note I cite Suenje Dallmeier-Tiessen et al., [http://arxiv.org/abs/0000.0000 Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing], arXiv, January 00, 0000, Table 0. But I should have included these details from Table 0. Publication fees were paid by the author's funder 00%, by the author's institution 00%, and by the author out of pocket 00%. Also add these new notes. + * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up p. 000], I say, "Moreover, even within the minority of fee-based OA journals, only 00 percent of those authors end paying the fees out of pocket. Almost 00% of the time, the fees at the fee-based journals are waived or paid by sponsors on behalf of authors." Here I call note 0 (note text at [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up pp. 000-000]). In that note I cite Suenje Dallmeier-Tiessen et al., [http://arxiv.org/abs/0000.0000 Highlights from the SOAP project survey. What Scientists Think about Open Access Publishing], arXiv, January 00, 0000, Table 0