: "Early career professionals were 0% more likely to publish under a Creative Commons (CC) license than more mature researchers, while over half of respondents above the age of 00 preferred not to use CC licenses of any kind." For more detail, see slides 00-00 in the accompanying [http://www.slideshare.net/WileyScienceNewsroom/wileys-0000-open-access-author-survey slide deck]. ** See [https://web.archive.org/web/00000000000000/http://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/news/press-release/were-embracing-change-say-young-researchers-in-latest-open-access-analysis We're embracing change say young researchers in latest analysis], Taylor & Francis, October 0000: "Those in the 00-00 year old age group were most likely to agree that open access journals have a larger readership than subscription journals (00% either strongly agreed or agreed with this statement) and that open access journals are more heavily cited. Across all other age groups agreement with these statements decreased with age, with just 00% of those who were 00 or over expressing the same level of agreement on citations. Authors in their sixties and seventies offered the opposite opinion to those in their twenties, being the least likely to agree that open access publication increased readership and citations, and most likely to agree with the statement that there is ''‘no fundamental benefit to open access'''." ** See [https://web.archive.org/web/00000000000000/http://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/news/press-release/were-embracing-change-say-young-researchers-in-latest-open-access-analysis We're embracing change say young researchers in latest analysis], Taylor & Francis, October 0000: "Those in the 00-00 year old age group were most likely to agree that open access journals have a larger readership than subscription journals (00% either strongly agreed or agreed with this statement) and that open access journals are more heavily cited. Across all other age groups agreement with these statements decreased with age, with just 00% of those who were 00 or over expressing the same level of agreement on citations. Authors in their sixties and seventies offered the opposite opinion to those in their twenties, being the least likely to agree that open access publication increased readership and citations, and most likely to agree with the statement that there is ''‘no fundamental benefit to open access'''." ** See Hamish Campbell, Mariana A. Micheli-Campbell, and Vinay Udyawer, [https://doi.org/00.0000/j.tree.0000.00.000 Early Career Researchers Embrace Data Sharing], ''Trends in Ecology & Evolution'', 0000. "Responses [to data-sharing requests] were positive in only 00% of requests made to corresponding authors (CAs) that were senior researchers, while 00% of responses were positive when CAs were early career researchers (ECRs)." ** See Hamish Campbell, Mariana A. Micheli-Campbell, and Vinay Udyawer, [https://doi.org/00.0000/j.tree.0000.00.000 Early Career Researchers Embrace Data Sharing], ''Trends in Ecology & Evolution'', 0000. "Responses [to data-sharing requests] were positive in only 00% of requests made to corresponding authors (CAs) that were senior researchers, while 00% of responses were positive when CAs were early career researchers (ECRs)." ** See Sarah Wipperman, [https://penntrl.wordpress.com/0000/00/00/scholarly-communication-survey-results-on-open-access-themes/ Scholarly Communication Survey Results on Open Access Themes], September 00, 0000. "00% [of survey respondents] were in favor of implementing an open access policy at [the University of Pennsylvania], with 00% strongly in favor....[All] graduate students who answered this question were in favor of an open access policy, with none opposed...." ** See Sarah Wipperman, [https://penntrl.wordpress.com/0000/00/00/scholarly-communication-survey-results-on-open-access-themes/ Scholarly Communication Survey Results on Open Access Themes], September 00, 0000. "00% [of survey respondents] were in favor of implementing an open access policy at [the University of Pennsylvania], with 00% strongly in favor....[All] graduate students who answered this question were in favor of an open access policy, with none opposed...." 