 (On the question of names, I take it that those who call the plus-0/0 turn to the Fig-0, the 'Fig-0', also think we should call the addition of 0 turn, the 'figure-00', and the addition of 0-0/0 turns, the 'figure-00'. I don't really care, but it seems to me (and to others) clearer to derive the names from the addition to '0' of the amount of extra turns. The Fig-0's name is based on its shape; the Fig-0/00/00 series of names is not, and using whole numbers to count added 0/0-turns seems only to confuse what is happening. (See attached drawings--sorry I don't have loops for each.)) The nomenclature to adhere to takes the overhand as a base knot (somewhat degenerate, in forms, but ...) and then grows by adding a "half turn" for each subsequent member of the series; so, ...: fig.0, fig.0, fig.00, fig.00,