 ** See Library Loon, [http://gavialib.com/0000/00/pyrrhic-publishers/ Pyrrhic publishers], ''Gavia Libraria'', June 00, 0000: "[T]he Loon must note that 'publishers' is not a monolith. 'Publishers' are not suing Georgia State; SAGE, Oxford, and Cambridge are. However. The vast bulk of toll-access publishers have consistently ranged themselves behind mendacious attacks on open access, behind Washington lobbyists fighting against the NIH Public Access Policy and policies like it, behind these lawsuits, behind anti-ETD whisper campaigns. Only a paltry few have ''any'' excuse ''whatever'' to say 'we're different from the monolith' " (emphases in original). <span id="p00"></span> <span id="p00.0"></span> <span id="p00"></span> <span id="p00.0"></span> Line 000: Line 000: <span id="p00"></span> <span id="p00.0"></span> <span id="p00"></span> <span id="p00.0"></span> * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n00/mode/0up p. 00], I say, "OA is not an attempt to reform, violate, or abolish copyright." Add these notes. * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n00/mode/0up p. 00], I say, "OA is not an attempt to reform, violate, or abolish copyright." Add these notes. 