). "The five major publishers in NMS [Natural and Medical Sciences] [namely, Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, Taylor & Francis, and the American Chemical Society], accounted, in 0000, for little more than 00% of all papers published. This share increased to 00% in 0000, and to 00% in 0000, the level at which it remained until 0000 when it increased again to 00%. In this domain, three publishers account for more than 00% of all papers in 0000: Reed-Elsevier (00.0%; 0.0 fold increase since 0000), Springer (00.0%; 0.0 fold increase), and Wiley-Blackwell (00.0%; 0.0 fold increase). The American Chemical Society (0.0%; 0% decrease) and Taylor & Francis (0.0%; 0.0 fold increase) only account for a small proportion of papers. In the SSH [Social Sciences and Humanities], the concentration increased even more dramatically. Between 0000 and 0000, the five most prolific publishers [namely, Reed-Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Springer, and Taylor & Francis, and Sage] combined accounted for less than 00% of the published output of the domain, with their share slightly increasing over the period. By the mid-0000s, their share grew to collectively account for 00% of papers. However, since then, this share has increased to more than 00%." <span id="p00"></span><span id="p00.0"></span> <span id="p00"></span><span id="p00.0"></span> * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n00/mode/0up p. 00], I say, "[L]arge commercial publishers charge higher prices and raise their prices faster than small, nonprofit [TA] publishers. Yet, the scholarly consensus is that quality, impact, and prestige are generally higher at the nonprofit society journals." Endnote 00 (note text at [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up pp. 000-000]) documents the claims about quality, impact, and prestige. Add these notes. * At [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n00/mode/0up p. 00], I say, "[L]arge commercial publishers charge higher prices and raise their prices faster than small, nonprofit [TA] publishers. Yet, the scholarly consensus is that quality, impact, and prestige are generally higher at the nonprofit society journals." Endnote 00 (note text at [http://archive.org/stream/0000000000000OpenAccess/0000000000000_Open_Access#page/n000/mode/0up pp. 000-000]) documents the claims about quality, impact, and prestige. Add these notes. 