 That is great news, Jay. Your paper is getting a very special treatment from one of the top journals. That is something to be proud of, regardless of the final outcome. I too have some good news. This paper of mine, which proposes an experiment to test my refutation of Bell's theorem (and which has been unfairly attacked by some on this very forum), has been accepted for publication. I dare not say which journal as yet, because some of the Bell mafia (especially Richard Gill) has been writing nasty letters about me to the President of my college in Oxford with malicious intent to hurt me. If I reveal the name of the journal here, then they will surely try to spook the editors of the journal about the paper (I am not being paranoid---they have done far worse). I will reveal the details as soon as the paper appears in print. The acceptance of the paper is of course a major step forward for an independent realization of the experiment. Most conspicuously, the referees and editors---who seemed quite competent and knowledgeable in both Clifford algebra and physics in general---did not question the validity of my classical derivation of the strong quantum correlations. So the uninformed critics like Richard Gill who have been unfairly attacking my work on Bell for the past several years were dead wrong. Some of us of course knew that, but it is good to be vindicated and endorsed by a highly competent and knowledgeable referees and editors of a respected physics journal. Joy